Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916077›Full record

ArticleL'Encephale2022

[CONFAMI study: Effects of home confinement during the COVID-19 epidemic on the lives of children and their families].

R Zebdi, E Plateau, A Delalandre, S Vanwalleghem, M Chahed, Y Hentati, G Chaudoye, E Moreau, B Lignier

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in L'Encephale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R ZebdiUR CLIPSYD, laboratoire EvaCliPsy, université Paris Nanterre, 200, avenue de la République, 92001 Nanterre cedex, France. Electronic address: rzebdi@parisnanterre.fr.
E PlateauHôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond-Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.
A DelalandreHôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond-Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.
S VanwalleghemUR CLIPSYD, laboratoire EvaCliPsy, université Paris Nanterre, 200, avenue de la République, 92001 Nanterre cedex, France.
M ChahedUniversité Tunis El Manar, Département de Psychologie, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Humaines de Tunis, 26, Avenue Darghouth Pacha, 1007 Tunis, Tunisie.
Y HentatiUniversité de Jendouba, Institut Supérieur des Études Appliquées et Humanité, Cité Eddir, 7100 Le Kef, Tunisie.
G ChaudoyeUR CLIPSYD, laboratoire A2P, université Paris Nanterre, 200, avenue de la République, 92001 Nanterre cedex, France.
E MoreauEspace Jeunes Adultes, 29, rue du faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75011 Paris, France.
B LignierLaboratoire de psychologie : dynamiques relationnelles et processus identitaires (Psy-DREPI, EA 7458), université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Esplanade Erasme, BP 27877, 21078 Dijon cedex, France; CSAPA La Santoline, SEDAP, Société d'Entraide et d'Action Psychologique, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to understand the changes within families during confinement motivated by the COVID-19 pandemic and to explore the psycho-emotional experiences of children and their parents in this new situation. Confinement necessarily induced significant changes in daily family routines, particularly for work, education, leisure and social activities. In the more vulnerable pediatric population, several authors have warned of the need to consider the impact of lockdown measures during COVID-19 on the psychological impact and well-being.

methodThis is an anonymous online survey with methodology combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. The questions targeted several themes such as life context, emotional experience and the impact on daily habits in children and adolescents, as perceived by parents. Participants are adults and parents of at least one child. They were recruited through social media and email.

resultsA total of 439 parents responded to the questionnaire. The families generally stayed in their usual place of residence and managed to adapt well. On average, the children's level of worry (as estimated by parents) was lower than the level of worry parents attributed to themselves. For the majority, the parents did not observe any change, the psychological state of the children and adolescents was generally stable, but for those who experienced more negative emotions than usual, it was an increase in boredom, irritability and anger. A decrease in the quality of sleep was also observed by a third of the respondents. On the other hand, an increase in autonomy was noted. Regarding the quality of family cohabitation, an important result showed that confinement had improved family relationships for 41% parents but at the expense of usual social ties inducing a feeling of deprivation. Indeed, the participants evoke a lack of "social link" and "social contact with friends". Lack became synonymous with absence, a feeling of loneliness and separation.

conclusionOur results confirm European and international data collected in children in countries where strict lockdown measures have been applied. Despite the negative emotions felt in some children, confinement has helped develop new resources in most families. Families seem to have been successful in maintaining a stable and secure routine which has certainly been a protective factor against anxiety. Some reported factors, such as bonding, could be protective factors and constitute good leads in interventions to be offered to children and their families.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultChildCommunicable Disease ControlFamilyHumansPandemicsParentsChild/adolescentConfinementCOVID-19 pandemicEnfant/adolescentFamilleFamilyPandémie COVID-19Psychological impactRetentissements psychologiques

Identifiers

PMID34916077
PMCPMC8491935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.