Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916049›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2022

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marie K Jessen, Mikael F Vallentin, Mathias J Holmberg, Maria Bolther, Frederik B Hansen, Johanne M Holst, Andreas Magnussen, Niklas S Hansen, Cecilie M Johannsen, Johannes Enevoldsen and 17 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05558826 unknown statusnot on this map

Analysis of Intra-abdominal Pressure and Trendelenburg Position Effect on Dynamic Indices of Arterial Pressure Waveform

TypeobservationalSponsorTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsAnesthesia, Fluid and Electrolyte Imbalance, Hemodynamic InstabilityArmsHemoSphere advanced monitoring platform with Acumen Hypotension Prediction Index Software
NCT06396884 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Versus Intermittent During Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients With Femoral Fracture: Observational Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2024 to 2025Enrolled146ConditionsNon Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring, Proximal Femur Fracture, Fluid TherapyArmsOscillometric intermittent non-invasive blood pressure, ClearSight
NCT06590064 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between Upper and Lower Extremity Blood Pressure in Thyroid Surgery Patients Under General Anesthesia

TypeobservationalSponsorIlsan Cha hospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled170ConditionsBlood Pressure, Diseases of the Thyroid GlandArmsNon-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Marie K JessenResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mikael F VallentinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mathias J HolmbergResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Maria BoltherDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Frederik B HansenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Johanne M HolstDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas MagnussenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Niklas S HansenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cecilie M JohannsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Johannes EnevoldsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas H JensenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Narvik, Norway.
Lara L RoesslerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Peter C LindDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Maibritt P KlitholmDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mark A EggertsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Philip CaapDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Caroline BoyeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karol M DabrowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lasse VormfenneDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria HøybyeResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jeppe HenriksenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Carl M KarlssonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ida R BallebyNational Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark.
Marie S RasmussenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kim PælestikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Asger GranfeldtDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars W AndersenResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: lwandersen@clin.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes.

methodsIncluded clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

resultsThe main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence.

conclusionsGoal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralGeneral SurgeryHemodynamicsHumansPostoperative Complicationsfluidgeneral anaesthesiagoal-directed haemodynamic therapyhaemodynamicsperioperative carepostoperative complicationsstroke volume

Identifiers

PMID34916049
PMCPMC8900265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.