Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915910›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2021

Police discretion in encounters with people who use drugs: operationalizing the theory of planned behavior.

Brandon Del Pozo, Emily Sightes, Jeremiah Goulka, Brad Ray, Claire A Wood, Saad Siddiqui, Leo A Beletsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
49.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Policing as a Structural Determinant of Health.Annual review of public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon Del PozoThe Miriam Hospital/Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 164 Summit Avenue, Providence, RI, 02906, USA. bdelpozo@lifespan.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-2196
Emily SightesCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Jeremiah GoulkaHealth in Justice Action Lab, Northeastern University, Boston, USA.
Brad RayCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Claire A WoodMissouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri St Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Saad SiddiquiMissouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri St Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Leo A BeletskySchool of Law and Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, USA.
Northeastern University · USUniversity of Missouri–St. Louis · USWayne State University · USBrown University · US

Funding

Project 4: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS): Fetus to First YearsP20GM125507 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI Ju Nyeong Park · 2018 to 2026
$23.4M
HIV and Other Infectious Consequences of Substance UseT32DA013911 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI TRACI C GREEN, JOSIAH D RICH · 2001 to 2026
$9.6M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA013911NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicing shapes the health risks of people who use drugs (PWUD), but little is understood about interventions that can align officer practices with PWUD health. This study deploys the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand what influences police intentions to make discretionary referrals to treatment and harm reduction resources rather than arrest on less serious charges.

methodsOn-line surveys integrating TPB constructs and adapting an instrument measuring police intentions to make mental health treatment referrals were completed by police employees in Indiana, Massachusetts, and Missouri. They also included items about stigma towards PWUD and attitudes and beliefs about opioid addiction, treatment, and recovery.

findingsAcross the sites, 259 respondents perceived control over their decision to arrest for misdemeanors (69%) and confiscate items such as syringes (56%). Beliefs about others' approval of referrals to treatment, its ability to reduce future arrests, and to increase trust in police were associated with stated practices of nonarrest for drug and possession and making referrals (p ≤ .001), and nonarrest for syringe possession (p ≤ .05). Stigma a towards PWUD was negatively associated with stated practices of nonarrest (p ≤ .05). Respondents identified supervisors as having the most influence over use of discretion, seriousness of the offense as the most influential value, and attitude of the suspect as the most important situational factor. The 17 Likert scale items analyzed had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81.

conclusionThe TPB offers untapped potential to better understand and modify police practices. In designing interventions to improve the health outcomes of police encounters with PWUD, further research should validate instruments that measure the relationship between these variables and discretionary intentions, and that measure role-relevant police stigma towards PWUD.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsPoliceHarm ReductionHumansLaw EnforcementSyringesPharmaceutical PreparationsHarm reductionLaw enforcementNaloxoneOpioidsOverdosePoliceStigmaSyringesTheory of Planned Behavior

Identifiers

PMID34915910
PMCPMC8675297
OpenAlexW4200318941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.