Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915897›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Is the healthy start scheme associated with increased food expenditure in low-income families with young children in the United Kingdom?

Jennie Parnham, Christopher Millett, Kiara Chang, Anthony A Laverty, Stephanie von Hinke, Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard, Eszter P Vamos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Food insecurity in children and young people in Scotland.The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennie ParnhamDepartment of Primary Care, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London, W6 8RP, UK. j.parnham18@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4385-2153
Christopher MillettDepartment of Primary Care, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Kiara ChangDepartment of Primary Care, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Anthony A LavertyDepartment of Primary Care, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Stephanie von HinkeUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan Pearson-StuttardDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eszter P VamosDepartment of Primary Care, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy Start is a food assistance programme in the United Kingdom (UK) which aims to provide a nutritional safety-net and enable low-income families on welfare benefits to access a healthier diet through the provision of food vouchers. Healthy Start was launched in 2006 but remains under-evaluated. This study aims to determine whether participation in the Healthy Start scheme is associated with differences in food expenditure in a nationally representative sample of households in the UK.

methodsCross-sectional analyses of the Living Costs and Food Survey dataset (2010-2017). All households with a child (0-3 years) or pregnant woman were included in the analysis (n = 4869). Multivariable quantile regression compared the expenditure and quantity of fruit and vegetables (FV), infant formula and total food purchases. Four exposure groups were defined based on eligibility, participation and income (Healthy Start Participating, Eligible Non-participating, Nearly Eligible low-income and Ineligible high-income households).

resultsOf 876 eligible households, 54% participated in Healthy Start. No statistically significant differences were found in FV or total food purchases between participating and eligible non-participating households, but infant formula purchases were lower in Healthy Start participating households. Ineligible higher-income households had higher purchases of FV.

conclusionThis study did not find evidence of an association between Healthy Start participation and FV expenditure. Moreover, inequalities in FV purchasing persist in the UK. Higher participation and increased voucher value may help to improve programme performance and counteract the harmful effects of poverty on diet.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceHealth ExpendituresChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPovertyPregnancyUnited KingdomVegetablesHealthy start vouchersNutrition assistance programmesPublic health nutrition, public health policy evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34915897
PMCPMC8680244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.