ArticleArthritis research & therapy2021
Using the co-expression network of T cell-activation-related genes to assess the disease activity in Takayasu's arteritis patients.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative imaging features of pulmonary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis on computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint imbalance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: insights into disease activity and precision immunotherapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A Glimpse into Humoral Response and Related Therapeutic Approaches of Takayasu's Arteritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Targeting immune checkpoints in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies associated vasculitis: the potential therapeutic targets in the future.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Disease Assessment in Takayasu Arteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Novel Th17 Lymphocyte Populations, Th17.1 and PD1+Th17, are Increased in Takayasu Arteritis, and Both Th17 and Th17.1 Sub-Populations Associate with Active Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
- Identification of the Association Between Toll-Like Receptors and T-Cell Activation in Takayasu's Arteritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere have been lacking reliable serum biomarkers in assessing the disease activity of Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). This study aimed to assess the disease activity of TAK by assayed gene expression levels in peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
methodsThe expression level of genes that essential in T cell activation in PBMCs in active TAK patients, inactive TAK patients, and healthy controls were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction, including TCR, CD28, CD40, CD40L, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4, TIGIT, TIM3, LAG3, CCL5, T-bet, RORC, and FOXP3. Gene co-expression network was established, and the signature of the topology structure in active TAK patients compared to the inactive TAK patients were extracted and described by formulas. Respectively, the disease activity was assessed by the routine serum biomarkers, including ESR, CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α, the gene expression level of TCR, CD28, T-bet, and RORC, as well as the signature of the topology structure, and the diagnostic efficacies were compared.
resultsCompared with the inactive TAK patient group, the active TAK patient group had a greater clustering coefficient in the network consisting of genes that essential in T cell activation. When assessing the disease activity used this signature of topology structure, the sensitivity was 90.9%, the specificity was 100%, and the AUC was 0.98, which was greater than the AUCs of these biomarkers.
conclusionsThe signature of the topology structure could distinguish the active TAK patients from inactive TAK patients. This maybe is a novel evaluation algorithm of disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.