Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915888›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Medical students' perceptions and coping strategies during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: studies, clinical implication, and professional identity.

Sophie Wurth, Julia Sader, Bernard Cerutti, Barbara Broers, Nadia M Bajwa, Sebastian Carballo, Monica Escher, Annick Galetto-Lacour, Olivier Grosgurin, Vanessa Lavallard and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Depression and anxiety among medical students in virtual education during COVID-19 pandemic].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "Medical science educator · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie WurthUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Julia SaderUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bernard CeruttiUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Barbara BroersUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nadia M BajwaUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sebastian CarballoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monica EscherUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Annick Galetto-LacourDepartment of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olivier GrosgurinDivision of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vanessa LavallardFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Georges SavoldelliUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques SerratriceDivision of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mathieu NendazUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marie-Claude Audétat-VoirolUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. marie-claude.audetat@unige.ch.
University of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic during spring 2020 has disrupted medical education worldwide. The University of Geneva decided to shift on-site classwork to online learning; many exams were transformed from summative to formative evaluations and most clinical activities were suspended. We aimed to investigate the perceived impact of those adaptations by the students at the Faculty of Medicine.

methodsWe sent an online self-administered survey to medical students from years 2 to 6 of the University of Geneva, three months after the beginning of the pandemic. The survey explored students' main activities during the first three months of the pandemic, the impact of the crisis on their personal life, on their training and on their professional identity, the level of stress they experienced and which coping strategies they developed. The survey consisted of open-ended and closed questions and was administered in French.

resultsA total of 58.8% of students responded (n = 467) and were homogeneously distributed across gender. At the time of the survey, two thirds of the participants were involved in COVID-19-related activities; 72.5% voluntarily participated, mainly fueled by a desire to help and feel useful. Many participants (58.8%) reported a feeling of isolation encountered since the start of the pandemic. Main coping strategies reported were physical activity and increased telecommunications with their loved ones. Most students described a negative impact of the imposed restrictions on their training, reporting decreased motivation and concentration in an unusual or distraction-prone study environment at home and missing interactions with peers and teachers. Students recruited to help at the hospital in the context of increasing staff needs reported a positive impact due to the enriched clinical exposure. Perceived stress levels were manageable across the surveyed population. If changed, the crisis had a largely positive impact on students' professional identity; most highlighted the importance of the health care profession for society and confirmed their career choice.

conclusionThrough this comprehensive picture, our study describes the perceived impact of the pandemic on University of Geneva medical students, their training and their professional identity three months after the start of the pandemic. These results allowed us to gain valuable insight that reinforced the relevance of assessing the evolution of the situation in the long run and the importance of developing institutional support tools for medical students throughout their studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Coping strategiesCOVID-19Health care professional identityMedical studentsOnline learningPerceived stress

Identifiers

PMID34915888
PMCPMC8674407
OpenAlexW4200209094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.