Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915861›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021

The gut microbiome as an indicator of habitat disturbance in a Critically Endangered lemur.

Nicolette McManus, Sheila M Holmes, Edward E Louis, Steig E Johnson, Andrea L Baden, Katherine R Amato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut Microbiome Variations in Herring Gulls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Gut microbiota of white-headed black langurs (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolette McManusDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Sheila M HolmesDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Edward E LouisGrewcock Center for Conservation and Research, Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha, NE, 68107, USA.
Steig E JohnsonDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Andrea L BadenDepartment of Anthropology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10065, USA. ab395@hunter.cuny.edu.
Katherine R AmatoDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. katherine.amato@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-9414
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Calgary · CAThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHabitat disturbance affects the biology and health of animals globally. Understanding the factors that contribute to the differential responses of animals to habitat disturbance is critical for conservation. The gut microbiota represents a potential pathway through which host responses to habitat disturbance might be mediated. However, a lack of quantitative environmental data in many gut microbiome (GM) studies of wild animals limits our ability to pinpoint mechanisms through which habitat disturbance affects the GM. Here, we examine the impact of anthropogenic habitat disturbance on the diet and GM of the Critically Endangered black-and-white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata editorum). We collected fecal samples and behavioral data from Varecia occupying habitats qualitatively categorized as primary forest, moderately disturbed forest, and heavily disturbed forest.

resultsVarecia diet and GM composition differed substantially across sites. Dietary richness predicted GM richness across sites, and overall GM composition was strongly correlated to diet composition. Additionally, the consumption of three specific food items positively correlated to the relative abundances of five microbial strains and one microbial genus across sites. However, diet did not explain all of the GM variation in our dataset, and differences in the GM were detected that were not correlated with diet, as measured.

conclusionsOur data suggest that diet is an important influence on the Varecia GM across habitats and thus could be leveraged in novel conservation efforts in the future. However, other factors such as contact with humans should also be accounted for. Overall, we demonstrate that quantitative data describing host habitats must be paired with GM data to better target the specific mechanisms through which environmental change affects the GM.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLemurLemuridaeAnimalsDietEcosystemHumansConservationDietHost-microbeMadagascarVarecia

Identifiers

PMID34915861
PMCPMC8680155
OpenAlexW4200308095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.