Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915570›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022

Machine Learning Identifies Digital Phenotyping Measures Most Relevant to Negative Symptoms in Psychotic Disorders: Implications for Clinical Trials.

Sayli M Narkhede, Lauren Luther, Ian M Raugh, Anna R Knippenberg, Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani, Hiroki Sayama, Alex S Cohen, Brian Kirkpatrick, Gregory P Strauss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Social network reductions are associated with negative symptoms in schizophrenia.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances and Challenges in Depression Marker Research.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sayli M NarkhedeDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Lauren LutherDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Ian M RaughDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-2395
Anna R KnippenbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Farnaz Zamani EsfahlaniDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Hiroki SayamaDepartment of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2670-5864
Alex S CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-6904
Brian KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA.
Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
University of Georgia · USBinghamton University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Modeling Anhedonia in Schizophrenia: A Stochastic Dynamical Systems ApproachR21MH112925 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2017 to 2018
$417k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital phenotyping has been proposed as a novel assessment tool for clinical trials targeting negative symptoms in psychotic disorders (PDs). However, it is unclear which digital phenotyping measurements are most appropriate for this purpose.

aimsMachine learning was used to address this gap in the literature and determine whether: (1) diagnostic status could be classified from digital phenotyping measures relevant to negative symptoms and (2) the 5 negative symptom domains (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect) were differentially classified by active and passive digital phenotyping variables.

methodsParticipants included 52 outpatients with a PD and 55 healthy controls (CN) who completed 6 days of active (ecological momentary assessment surveys) and passive (geolocation, accelerometry) digital phenotyping data along with clinical ratings of negative symptoms.

resultsMachine learning algorithms classifying the presence of a PD diagnosis yielded 80% accuracy for cross-validation in H2O AutoML and 79% test accuracy in the Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross Validation feature selection model. Models classifying the presence vs absence of clinically significant elevations on each of the 5 negative symptom domains ranged in test accuracy from 73% to 91%. A few active and passive features were highly predictive of all 5 negative symptom domains; however, there were also unique predictors for each domain.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that negative symptoms can be modeled from digital phenotyping data recorded in situ. Implications for selecting the most appropriate digital phenotyping variables for use as outcome measures in clinical trials targeting negative symptoms are discussed.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersWeights and Measuresclassificationdigital phenotypingecological momentary assessmentfeature selectionmachine learningnegative symptomsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID34915570
PMCPMC8886590
OpenAlexW4200133121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.