Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915243›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

Innovative methods to analyse the impact of gender norms on adolescent health using global health survey data.

Beniamino Cislaghi, Ann M Weber, Holly B Shakya, Safa Abdalla, Amiya Bhatia, Benjamin W Domingue, Iván Mejía-Guevara, Lindsay Stark, Ilana Seff, Linda M Richter and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eating Disorders in Children and Adolescent Males: A Peculiar Psychopathological Profile.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Beniamino CislaghiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, London, UK.
Ann M WeberSchool of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
Holly B ShakyaDepartment of Medicine, Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Safa AbdallaGlobal Center for Gender Equality, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amiya BhatiaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, London, UK.
Benjamin W DomingueGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Iván Mejía-GuevaraCenter for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Aging and Ethnogeriatrics (SAGE) Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lindsay StarkBrown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ilana SeffBrown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Linda M RichterCentre of Excellence in Human Development, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Ana Maria Baptista MenezesInternational Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande de Sul, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande de Sul, Brazil.
Gary L DarmstadtGlobal Center for Gender Equality, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: gdarmsta@stanford.edu.
Equality Now · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRWashington University in St. Louis · USStanford Medicine · USStanford University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S, YESAVAGE, JEROME A · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
Adolescent fertility and social networks in rural HondurasK01HD087551 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAKYA, HOLLY BAKER · 2016 to 2020
$693k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD087551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how gender norms affect health is an important entry point into designing programs and policies to change norms and improve gender equality and health. However, it is rare for global health datasets to include questions on gender norms, especially questions that go beyond measuring gender-related attitudes, thus limiting gender analysis.

methodsWe developed five case studies using health survey data from six countries to demonstrate approaches to defining and operationalising proxy measures and analytic approaches to investigating how gender norms can affect health. Key findings, strengths and limitations of our norms proxies and methodological choices are summarised.

findingsCase studies revealed links between gender norms and multiple adolescent health outcomes. Proxys for norms were derived from data on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, as well as differences between attitudes and behaviours. Data were cross-sectional, longitudinal, census- and social network-based. Analytic methods were diverse. We found that gender norms affect: 1) Intimate partner violence in Nigeria; 2) Unhealthy weight control behaviours in Brazil and South Africa; 3) HIV status in Zambia; 4) Health and social mobility in the US; and 5) Childbirth in Honduras.

interpretationResearchers can use existing global health survey data to examine pathways through which gender norms affect health by generating proxies for gender norms. While direct measures of gender norms can greatly improve the understanding of how gender affects health, proxy measures for norms can be designed for the specific health-related outcome and normative context, for instance by either aggregating behaviours or attitudes or quantifying the difference (dissonance) between them. These norm proxies enable evaluations of the influence of gender norms on health and insights into possible reference groups and sanctions for non-compliers, thus informing programmes and policies to shape norms and improve health.

Indexed as

Global HealthIntimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentAdolescent HealthHealth SurveysHumansSocial NormsSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesBehavioursGender equalityGender normsGlobal healthReference groupSanctionsSurvey data

Identifiers

PMID34915243
PMCPMC8819155
OpenAlexW4200231793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.