Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34915102›Full record

ArticleAppetite2022

Highly processed food intake and immediate and future emotions in everyday life.

Jenna R Cummings, Emma T Schiestl, A Janet Tomiyama, Tanvi Mamtora, Ashley N Gearhardt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna R CummingsDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. Electronic address: jenna.cummings@nih.gov.
Emma T SchiestlDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
A Janet TomiyamaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Tanvi MamtoraDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Ashley N GearhardtDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Kanakadurga Singer · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
Training in Developmental Science to Improve Child Health and Well-BeingT32HD079350 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD079350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased consumption of highly processed foods may result in lower diet quality, and low diet quality is associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. One mechanism driving highly processed food intake is the expectation that eating these foods will improve emotional experiences, particularly in individuals with elevated "highly processed food addiction" symptoms. However, experimental findings about the emotional experiences following highly processed food intake are mixed. Furthermore, prior studies have generally failed to capture the potentially prolonged emotional effects of eating highly processed foods and not tested for individual differences. The present study was a preregistered archival data analysis of an ambulatory electronic diary study that captured real-life emotions following highly processed food intake. Multilevel modeling was used to predict the effects of highly processed food intake on subsequent positive and negative emotions immediately, 1 h, and 3 h after consumption. Intake of sweet high-fat foods, fast foods, and non-alcoholic sugary drinks was associated with greater positive emotions immediately after eating, and sweet high-fat food intake remained associated with greater positive emotions 1 h later. Sweet high-fat food and non-alcoholic sugary drink intake were associated with fewer negative emotions 1 h after consumption, and the negative association between non-alcoholic sugary drink intake and negative emotions was stronger for those with elevated highly processed food addiction symptoms. Overall, results suggest that highly processed food intake results in small alterations in positive and negative emotions immediately and up to 1 h after intake; however, these do not persist through 3 h after intake. The ability of highly processed foods to briefly alter emotions may be key to their reinforcing nature.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietEatingEmotionsEnergy IntakeFast FoodsHumansAmbulatory electronic diaryEmotionFood addictionHighly processed foods

Identifiers

PMID34915102
PMCPMC8886797
OpenAlexW4200252455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.