Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34914700›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Acoustic traits of bat-pollinated flowers compared to flowers of other pollination syndromes and their echo-based classification using convolutional neural networks.

Ralph Simon, Karol Bakunowski, Angel Eduardo Reyes-Vasques, Marco Tschapka, Mirjam Knörnschild, Jan Steckel, Dan Stowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ralph SimonCoSys-Lab, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-0394
Karol BakunowskiMachine Listening Lab, Centre for Digital Music (C4DM), Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-1289
Angel Eduardo Reyes-VasquesFlorida Spectrum Environmental Services, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States of America.
Marco TschapkaInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9511-6775
Mirjam KnörnschildSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-0448-9600
Jan SteckelCoSys-Lab, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dan StowellMachine Listening Lab, Centre for Digital Music (C4DM), Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-3769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bat-pollinated flowers have to attract their pollinators in absence of light and therefore some species developed specialized echoic floral parts. These parts are usually concave shaped and act like acoustic retroreflectors making the flowers acoustically conspicuous to the bats. Acoustic plant specializations only have been described for two bat-pollinated species in the Neotropics and one other bat-dependent plant in South East Asia. However, it remains unclear whether other bat-pollinated plant species also show acoustic adaptations. Moreover, acoustic traits have never been compared between bat-pollinated flowers and flowers belonging to other pollination syndromes. To investigate acoustic traits of bat-pollinated flowers we recorded a dataset of 32320 flower echoes, collected from 168 individual flowers belonging to 12 different species. 6 of these species were pollinated by bats and 6 species were pollinated by insects or hummingbirds. We analyzed the spectral target strength of the flowers and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) on the spectrograms of the flower echoes. We found that bat-pollinated flowers have a significantly higher echo target strength, independent of their size, and differ in their morphology, specifically in the lower variance of their morphological features. We found that a good classification accuracy by our CNN (up to 84%) can be achieved with only one echo/spectrogram to classify the 12 different plant species, both bat-pollinated and otherwise, with bat-pollinated flowers being easier to classify. The higher classification performance of bat-pollinated flowers can be explained by the lower variance of their morphology.

Indexed as

AcousticsFlowersAnimalsChiropteraEcholocationNeural Networks, ComputerPollinationSound Spectrography

Identifiers

PMID34914700
PMCPMC8718002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.