ArticleAging2021
The risk of distant metastases in patients with gynecologic cancers after surgery: a population-based study.
Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploration of organoids in ovarian cancer: From basic research to clinical translation.Translational oncology · 2024Review
- Causal effect analysis of estrogen receptor associated breast cancer and clear cell ovarian cancer.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Dihydromyricetin Inhibited Migration and Invasion by Reducing S100A4 Expression through ERK1/2/β-Catenin Pathway in Human Cervical Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the risk of distant metastases in patients with gynecologic cancers after surgery, including cervical, uterine and ovarian cancers. This is a retrospective study evaluating gynecologic cancer from 2009 to 2014 using population-based administrative datasets from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC) and from The National Health Informatics Project (NHIP). A total of 1,464 gynecologic cancer patients, including 321 cervical cancer patients, 724 uterine cancer patients and 419 ovarian cancer patients, were analyzed retrospectively from 2009 to 2014. Among the cervical cancer patients, 173 (53.89%) received surgery only and 148 (46.11%) received surgery with radiotherapy /chemotherapy. Among the uterus cancer patients, 425(58.70%) received surgery only and 299 (41.3%) received surgery with radiotherapy /chemotherapy. Among the ovarian cancer patients, 81 (19.33%) received surgery only and 338 (80.67%) received surgery with radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Among patients with brain, liver or lung metastasis, cervical cancer patients have more cumulative metastasis-free survival than those ovarian cancer (p=0.0041). In analyzing liver metastasis based on primary cancer sites, cervical cancer patients and uterine cancer cases have more cumulative metastasis- free survival than those ovarian cancer (p<0.0001). In conclusion, ovarian cancer patients have higher risk of liver metastasis than cervical or uterine cancer. There were significantly different of pathological stage for cumulative metastasis-free survival among gynecologic cancer patients with brain or liver or lung metastasis. Pathological T stage remains the main predictive for distant metastasis of gynecologic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.