ArticleThe Prostate2022
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Article in The Prostate, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology oncology · 2024Pooled it
- The accuracy of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Is Saturation Biopsy Still a Viable Alternative to Fusion Biopsy in the Era of Multiparametric MRI? A Comparative Analysis in Patients With Prior Negative Biopsy.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Is MRI/US-guided fusion biopsy ready to replace systematic biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate carcinoma? - a retrospective study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Are Big Prostates a Challenge? Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Detection Rate in Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate.Advances in urology · 2026Article
- To biopsy or not biopsy, that is the question - PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions - validation of clinical and radiological parameters for biopsy decision-making.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer detection with transrectal in-bore MRI biopsies: impact of prostate volume and lesion features.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- The Utility of Transperineal Template Saturation Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Advances in urology · 2025Article
- ProsTAV, a clinically useful test in prostate cancer: an extension study.World journal of urology · 2024Observational
- Development of an effective predictive screening tool for prostate cancer using the ClarityDX machine learning platform.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Interassay Variability and Clinical Implications of Five Different Prostate-specific Antigen Assays.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Proclarix in the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Detecting MRI-Invisible Prostate Cancers Using a Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Model.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2024Article
- BioPrev-C - development and validation of a contemporary prostate cancer risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in a selection of patients under active surveillance and confirmation of patients with negative biopsy for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Does experience change the role of systematic biopsy during MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate?World journal of urology · 2023Article
- The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers.Radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsy (SBx) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy (TBx). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 392 men who underwent SBx and TBx in case of suspicious lesions from November 2016 to October 2019. Triggers for a biopsy were an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or positive digital rectal examination and only treatment naïve patients without a previous diagnosis of PCa were included. Study inclusion occurred before biopsy and a prebiopsy mpMRI was available in all men. SBx were taken from 20 different locations according to the modified Barzell zones. The primary endpoint was the detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and insignificant PCa (ciPCa) by SBx and/or TBx by comparing the two methods alone and in combination. Additional TBx were taken for any prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) lesion ≥3 seen on the mpMRI. csPCa was defined as any Gleason score ≥7 and ciPCa as Gleason score 6.
resultsA total of 392 men with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-69), a median PSA of 7.0 ng/ml (IQR: 4.8-10.1) were enrolled. Overall, PCa was found in 200 (51%) of all biopsied men, with 158 (79%) being csPCa and 42 (21%) ciPCa. A total of 268 (68%) men with a suspicious mpMRI and underwent a combined TBx and SBx, of whom csPCa was found in 139 (52%). In this subgroup, 116/139 (83%) csPCa would have been detected by TBx alone, and an additional 23 (17%) were found by SBx. Men with a negative mpMRI (PI-RADS < 3, n = 124, 32%) were found to have csPCa in 19 (15%) cases. In patients with a negative mpMRI in combination with a PSA density <0.1 ng/ml
conclusionIn comparison to SBx, TBx alone detects csPCa in only ¾ of all men with a positive mpMRI lesion. Thus, systematic biopsies in addition to TBx have to be considered at least in some who undergo a prostate biopsy. In men with a negative mpMRI, SBx still detects 15% csPCa, but similarly overdetecting ciPCa. According to our results, low PSA density and negative mpMRI findings could be used to decide which men can safely avoid biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.