Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34914041›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Principles in Immunology for the Design and Development of Vaccines.

Claudius U Meyer, Fred Zepp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Structure-guidedBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudius U MeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Fred ZeppDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany. fred.zepp@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinology has come a long way from early, empirically developed vaccines to modern vaccines rationally designed and produced. Vaccines are meant to cooperate with the human immune system, the later largely unknown in the early years of vaccine development. In the recent years, a tremendous depth of knowledge has been accumulated in the field of immunology that has provided an opportunity to understand the mechanisms of action of the vaccine components. In parallel, our knowledge in microbiology, molecular biology, infectiology, epidemiology, and furthermore in bioinformatics has fostered our understanding of the interaction of microorganisms with the human immune system. Strategies engaged by pathogens strongly determine the targets of a vaccine, which should be formulated to stimulate potent and efficiently protective immune responses. The improved knowledge of immune response mechanisms has facilitated the development of new vaccines with the capacity to selectively address the key pathogenic mechanisms. The primary goal of a vaccine design might no longer be to mimic the pathogen but to identify the relevant processes of the pathogenic mechanisms to be effectively interrupted by a highly specific immune response, eventually surpassing natural limitations. Vaccines have become complex sets of components meant to orchestrate the fine-tuning of the immune processes leading to a lasting and specific immune memory. In addition to antigenic materials, which are comprised of the most critical immunogenic epitopes, adjuvant components are frequently added to induce a favorable immunological activation. Furthermore, for reasons of production and product stability preservatives, stabilizers, inactivators, antibiotics, or diluents could be present, but need to be evaluated. While on the one hand vaccine effectiveness is a primary goal, on the other hand side effects need to be excluded due to safety and tolerability. Further challenges in vaccinology include variability of the vaccinees, the variability of the pathogen, the population-based settings of vaccine application, and the process technology in vaccine production. Vaccine design has become more tailored and in turn has opened up the potential of extending its application to hitherto not accessible complex microbial pathogens plus providing new immunotherapies to tackle diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and autoimmune disease. This chapter gives an overview of the key considerations and processes involved in vaccine design and development. It also describes the basic principles of normal immune responses and in their function in defense of infectious agents by vaccination.

Indexed as

Vaccine DevelopmentVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicHumansVaccinationVaccine EfficacyAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccinesAdjuvantB cellImmune memoryInfectious diseasePathogenT cellVaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34914041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.