ArticleJAMA network open2021
Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Progression to Dementia in Memory Clinic Patients.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning based algorithms for virtual early detection and screening of neurodegenerative and neurocognitive disorders: a systematic-review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Dementia Prediction: A Systematic Review and Future Research Directions.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- A Flexible-Horizon Clinical Decision Support Model for Dementia Early Detection and Risk Prediction in Secondary Care: A Responsible AI Approach.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Network outcome analysis of cognitive function and daily functioning and risk of dementia among adults aged 50 years and older: an 8-year prospective study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies in Cognitive Impairment.Translational stroke research · 2026Review
- Language dysfunction as a primary feature of cognitive decline in neurological populations.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Review
- Explainable machine learning with bayesian hyper-optimization for predicting cognitive impairment from longitudinal nursing home data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhanced diagnostic interpretation of the MoCA using machine learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Stratifying dementia risk factors: A prediction model and hypothesis-driven analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Early-stage diagnosis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders via multiple learning models based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Identification of novel biomarkers and drug targets for frailty-related skeletal muscle aging: a multi-omics study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025Article
- Enhancing the validity of CAIDE dementia risk scores with resting heart rate and machine learning: An analysis from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center across all races/ethnicities.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- A preliminary study of the reliability and validity of the Uyghur version of the NUCOG cognitive screening application.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence with ensemble of deep learning model for dementia prediction to enhance clinical decision support systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a novel predictive model for dementia risk in middle-aged and elderly depression individuals: a large and longitudinal machine learning cohort study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Estimation of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Dementia Risk in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: UK Biobank Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Prediction of cognitive conversion within the Alzheimer's disease continuum using deep learning.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Developing multifactorial dementia prediction models using clinical variables from cohorts in the US and Australia.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of vascular cognitive impairment and identification of imaging markers using machine learning: a multimodal MRI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Machine learning algorithms could be used as the basis for clinical decision-making aids to enhance clinical practice. Objective: To assess the ability of machine learning algorithms to predict dementia incidence within 2 years compared with existing models and determine the optimal analytic approach and number of variables required. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study used data from a prospective cohort of 15 307 participants without dementia at baseline to perform a secondary analysis of factors that could be used to predict dementia incidence. Participants attended National Alzheimer Coordinating Center memory clinics across the United States between 2005 and 2015. Analyses were conducted from March to May 2021. Exposures: 258 variables spanning domains of dementia-related clinical measures and risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incident all-cause dementia diagnosed within 2 years of baseline assessment. Results: In a sample of 15 307 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [9.8] years; 9129 [60%] women and 6178 [40%] men) without dementia at baseline, 1568 (10%) received a diagnosis of dementia within 2 years of their initial assessment. Compared with 2 existing models for dementia risk prediction (ie, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia Risk Score, and the Brief Dementia Screening Indicator), machine learning algorithms were superior in predicting incident all-cause dementia within 2 years. The gradient-boosted trees algorithm had a mean (SD) overall accuracy of 92% (1%), sensitivity of 0.45 (0.05), specificity of 0.97 (0.01), and area under the curve of 0.92 (0.01) using all 258 variables. Analysis of variable importance showed that only 6 variables were required for machine learning algorithms to achieve an accuracy of 91% and area under the curve of at least 0.89. Machine learning algorithms also identified up to 84% of participants who received an initial dementia diagnosis that was subsequently reversed to mild cognitive impairment or cognitively unimpaired, suggesting possible misdiagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that machine learning algorithms could accurately predict incident dementia within 2 years in patients receiving care at memory clinics using only 6 variables. These findings could be used to inform the development and validation of decision-making aids in memory clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.