Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34913823›Full record

ArticleExpert review of anticancer therapy2022

Amivantamab for the treatment of

Simon Vyse, Paul H Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation: Research Status and New Treatment Strategies].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon VyseDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-2869
Paul H HuangDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3972-5087
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19281Cancer Research UK C36478/A19281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmivantamab is a monoclonal bispecific anti-EGFR-MET antibody that is the first targeted therapy to be approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring AREAS COVERED: In this article, we outline the drug profile of amivantamab compared with EGFR kinase inhibitors under evaluation in EXPERT OPINION: Unlike small molecule EGFR kinase inhibitors, amivantamab has an extracellular mode of action and dual activity against EGFR and MET. It remains to be determined what role MET inhibition plays in toxicity and efficacy and whether dual target inhibition can delay the onset of drug resistance in these cancers. Due to its large molecular size, amivantamab is expected to have poor activity to treat brain metastases. Building on the clinical data so far, future trials that will evaluate combination treatments with brain-penetrant EGFR kinase inhibitors will be critical to move the drug toward a first-line treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, BispecificErbB ReceptorsExonsHumansMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsamivantamabAntibodies, BispecificEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAmivantamabEGFRexon 20 insertionslung cancermonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID34913823
PMCPMC11614048
OpenAlexW4200220270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.