Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34913466›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2021

The zebrafish issue: 25 years on.

Mary C Mullins, Joaquín Navajas Acedo, Rashmi Priya, Lilianna Solnica-Krezel, Stephen W Wilson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Scalable CRISPR Screens in Zebrafish Using MIC-Drop.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adult zebrafish as advanced models of human disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary C MullinsUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9979-1564
Joaquín Navajas AcedoBiozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2855-6660
Rashmi PriyaThe Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0510-7515
Lilianna Solnica-KrezelCenter of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-221X
Stephen W WilsonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London,London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-5940
The Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Inductive and morphogenetic processes shaping the zebrafish embryonic axesR35GM118179 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LILIANNA SOLNICAKREZEL · 2016 to 2026
$7.4M
Oocyte polarity and BMP-mediated dorsoventral patterningR35GM131908 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Mary C. Mullins · 2019 to 2026
$5.6M
British Heart Foundation SP/F/20/150014Cancer Research UK FC011160Medical Research Council FC011160Medical Research Council MR/L003775/1Medical Research Council MR/T020164/1NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118179NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131908Wellcome Trust FC011160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 1990s, labs on both sides of the Atlantic performed the largest genetic mutagenesis screen at that time using an emerging model organism: the zebrafish. Led by Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard in Tübingen, Germany, and Wolfgang Driever in Boston, USA, these colossal screens culminated in 1996 with the publication of 37 articles in a special issue of Development, which remains the journal's largest issue to this day. To celebrate the anniversary of the zebrafish issue and reflect on the 25 years since its publication, five zebrafish researchers share what the issue means to them, how it has contributed to their career and its impact on the zebrafish community.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansMutagenesisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34913466
PMCPMC10656453
OpenAlexW4200253641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.