Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34913353›Full record

ReviewPhysiological research2021

COVID-19 and the differences in physiological background between children and adults and their clinical consequences.

L Kapustova, O Petrovicova, P Banovcin, M Antosova, A Bobcakova, I Urbancikova, Z Rennerova, M Jesenak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. COVID-19 in Children and Vitamin D.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and Infantile Diseases.Global medical genetics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Activated CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L KapustovaClinic of Pediatric Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, National Institute of Children's Diseases, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. zuzana.rennerova@nudch.sk and Clinic of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Clinic of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Teaching Hospital in Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic. jesenak@gmail.com.
O Petrovicova
P Banovcin
M Antosova
A Bobcakova
I Urbancikova
Z Rennerova
M Jesenak
Comenius University Bratislava · SKMartin University Hospital · SKSlovak Medical University · SKUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has indeed been one of the most significant problems facing the world in the last decade. It has affected (directly or indirectly) the entire population and all age groups. Children have accounted for 1.7 % to 2 % of the diagnosed cases of COVID-19. COVID-19 in children is usually associated with a mild course of the disease and a better survival rate than in adults. In this review, we investigate the different mechanisms which underlie this observation. Generally, we can say that the innate immune response of children is strong because they have a trained immunity, allowing the early control of infection at the site of entry. Suppressed adaptive immunity and a dysfunctional innate immune response is seen in adult patients with severe infections but not in children. This may relate to immunosenescence in the elderly. Another proposed factor is the different receptors for SARS-CoV-2 and their differences in expression between these age groups. In infants and toddlers, effective immune response to viral particles can be modulated by the pre-existing non-specific effect of live attenuated vaccines on innate immunity and vitamin D prophylaxis. However, all the proposed mechanisms require verification in larger cohorts of patients. Our knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 is still developing.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentChild DevelopmentAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Host-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmune SystemInfantInfant, NewbornPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34913353
PMCPMC8884370
OpenAlexW4200184694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.