Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34913122›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Characterization of Mammalian In Vivo Enhancers Using Mouse Transgenesis and CRISPR Genome Editing.

Marco Osterwalder, Stella Tran, Riana D Hunter, Eman M Meky, Kianna von Maydell, Anne N Harrington, Janeth Godoy, Catherine S Novak, Ingrid Plajzer-Frick, Yiwen Zhu and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crosstalk BetweenCancers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco Osterwalder *Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Stella Tran *Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Riana D HunterEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Eman M MekyEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kianna von MaydellEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Anne N HarringtonEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Janeth GodoyEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Catherine S NovakEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ingrid Plajzer-FrickEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yiwen ZhuEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jennifer A AkiyamaEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Veena AfzalEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Evgeny Z KvonEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Len A PennacchioEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. LAPennacchio@lbl.gov.
Diane E DickelEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. DEDickel@lbl.gov.
Axel ViselEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. AVisel@lbl.gov.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Generation of an In Vivo Human Genome Transcriptional Enhancer DatasetR01HG003988 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI Len Alexander Pennacchio · 2006 to 2026
$24.1M
A Single-Cell Resolution Enhancer Atlas of Craniofacial DevelopmentR01DE028599 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI VISEL, AXEL · 2019 to 2023
$4.2M
Linking Psychiatric Genetics to Cell-Type Specific Enhancer FunctionR01MH117106 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI VISEL, AXEL · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Functional assessment of enhancer-gene interactions in vivoR00HG009682 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KVON, EVGENY · 2020 to 2022
$736k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG009682NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003988NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028599NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic morphogenesis is strictly dependent on tight spatiotemporal control of developmental gene expression, which is typically achieved through the concerted activity of multiple enhancers driving cell type-specific expression of a target gene. Mammalian genomes are organized in topologically associated domains, providing a preferred environment and framework for interactions between transcriptional enhancers and gene promoters. While epigenomic profiling and three-dimensional chromatin conformation capture have significantly increased the accuracy of identifying enhancers, assessment of subregional enhancer activities via transgenic reporter assays in mice remains the gold standard for assigning enhancer activity in vivo. Once this activity is defined, the ideal method to explore the functional necessity of a transcriptional enhancer and its contribution to target gene dosage and morphological or physiological processes is deletion of the enhancer sequence from the mouse genome. Here we present detailed protocols for efficient introduction of enhancer-reporter transgenes and CRISPR-mediated genomic deletions into the mouse genome, including a step-by-step guide for pronuclear microinjection of fertilized mouse eggs. We provide instructions for the assembly and genomic integration of enhancer-reporter cassettes that have been used for validation of thousands of putative enhancer sequences accessible through the VISTA enhancer browser, including a recently published method for robust site-directed transgenesis at the H11 safe-harbor locus. Together, these methods enable rapid and large-scale assessment of enhancer activities and sequence variants in mice, which is essential to understand mammalian genome function and genetic diseases.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGene EditingAnimalsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Transfer TechniquesGenomicsMicecis-regulatory elementsCRISPRDeletionsEnhancersGene transcriptionH11LacZ reporterPronuclear injectionTransgenesisTransgenic mice

Identifiers

PMID34913122
OpenAlexW4200103838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.