ReviewCurrent urology reports2021
Online Collaborative Learning in Urology.
Review in Current urology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The State of Urotrauma Education Among Residency Programs in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current urology reports · 2023Pooled it
- Evolving Curricular Needs of Rheumatology Fellowship Programs, Fellows-in-Training, and the American College of Rheumatology's Virtual Rheumatology Program for Fellows-in-Training.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Models and Metrics for Medical Education in Urology: Medical Student Education, Resident Education, and Future Directions.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- From Imaging to Impact: A Multi-Disciplinary T32 Program Framework and Initial Insights for Training in Image-Guided Cancer Therapy [Advance Publication].Advances in cancer education and quality improvement · 2025Article
- Comparison of face-to-face teaching and online teaching in neurosurgery education for medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Mapping the Landscape: A Systematic Review of Technology Trends in Medical Education and Competency Development.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Re-envisioning Patient Education and Public Awareness of Urological Cancers at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic.European urology open science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
reason for reviewA recent shift towards use of telehealth and remote learning has significant implications on resident and fellow education in urology. Implementation of multi-institutional online didactic programs, spurred on by the COVID epidemic, has changed the traditional resident teaching paradigm from individual institutional silos of knowledge and expertise to a shared nationwide database of learning. RECENT
findingsIn this article, we explore the current trend towards virtual education and its progress to date, lessons learned on the optimization of this teaching modality, and future direction and sustainability of collaborated, standardized and accessible didactic education in urology. Multi-institutional collaborative remote video didactics has emerged as a critical part of resident education. These lectures have been overwhelmingly successful and have persisted beyond the pandemic to become a part of the urologic training curricula. This collaborative and standardized approach to resident education provides access to national and international experts, encourages cross-institutional collaboration and discussion, and builds a repository of lectures with easy access for learners. Utilization of this teaching modality will continue to be impactful in urologic training and will require ongoing efforts and input from both collaborating intuitions and professional societies to continue to improve on and engage in this important learning tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.