Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34913082›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2021

Living Donor Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation: a New Standard of Care?

Andrea Gallioli, Juan Gómez Rivas, Alessandro Larcher, Alberto Breda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Robotic kidney transplantation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340 - 350, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. andrea.gallioli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3316-5691
Juan Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Alessandro LarcherUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340 - 350, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESEuropean Association of Urology · NLVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRobot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has the potential to combine the advantages of minimally invasive surgery with the best renal replacement treatment. Over the last decade, the results were encouraging, as surgical and functional outcomes seem optimal in living donation. Recent studies focused on the comparison with open kidney transplantation (OKT), special situations such as obese patients or multiple vessels grafts and optimization of the technique to increase its surgical indications. RECENT

findingsRelative to OKT, RAKT has longer rewarming time and operative time, but lower intraoperative blood loss. Wound-related events and postoperative pain decrease with robotic technique. This has been also demonstrated in obese patients, where RAKT may be particularly beneficial. No significant difference was found in graft function, graft survival, and patient survival with RAKT and OKT in short- and mid-term follow-up. A multiple vessels graft should not be considered a contraindication to robotic surgery. Intracorporeal cooling systems for regional hypothermia have not been applied in RAKT yet. Future challenges will be the inclusion of patients with atheromatous iliac arteries and transplantation programs for deceased donors. A randomized-controlled trial is needed to definitively confirm the findings of retrospective and prospective cohort studies. The implementation of the procedure in more centers depends on broader indications, which might ultimately decrease procedure-related costs. To guarantee the applicability of RAKT from deceased donors, it is fundamental to optimize the graft cooling systems and to include recipients with atheromatous iliac arteries.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLiving DonorsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeKidney transplantationRegional hypothermiaRobot-assisted kidney transplantationRobotic surgeryVascular anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID34913082
OpenAlexW4200268534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.