Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912998›Full record

ArticleAsiaIntervention2021

Impact of a telemedicine-guided, population-based, STEMI network on reperfusion strategy, efficiency, and outcomes: Impact of telemedicine on STEMI management.

Sameer Mehta, Haytham Aboushi, Carlos Campos, Roberto Botelho, Francisco Fernandez, Daniel Rodriguez, Mario Torres, Daniel Vieria, Alejandra Frauenfelder, Gladys Pinto and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AsiaIntervention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sameer MehtaLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Haytham AboushiLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Carlos CamposHeart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto BotelhoTriangulo Heart Institute and Eurolatino Medical Research, Uberlandia, Brazil.
Francisco FernandezITMS, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel RodriguezLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Mario TorresLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Daniel VieriaLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Alejandra FrauenfelderLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Gladys PintoLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Claudia LopezLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Maria AcostaLumen Foundation, Miami, FL, USA.
Centro Universitário do Triângulo · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA telemedicine-guided strategy increases the access to and efficiency of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) networks resulting in increased access to, and reduced disparities in, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care between rural and urban areas. METHODS AND

resultsThe Latin America Telemedicine Infarct Network (LATIN) was developed for poor and remote regions in Brazil and Colombia that lacked coordinated AMI systems of care. It strategically connects small clinics and primary care health centres (spokes) to hubs with 24/7 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability. Experts at three remote sites provide urgent electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis and tele-consultation for the entire network. Data from the busiest LATIN site, the Santa Marcelina Hospital in Sao Paolo, Brazil, were compared with health statistics from Sistema Unico de Saude (Brazilian Public Health System - SUS). A total of 192 centres were networked using standardised and guideline-based protocols for AMI care. Overall, 313,897 patients were remotely screened, 3,572 AMI diagnosed (1.1%), and 1,636 AMI urgently reperfused (45.8%), mainly by primary PCI (n=1,351; 83%).

conclusionsIn conclusion, a comparison between a pre-LATIN cohort from SUS (1,015) and a LATIN cohort from Santa Marcelina Hospital (1,247) revealed increased reperfusion with PCI (65.52% vs 75.2%), increased cost ($2,037.12 vs $2,246.40, p<0.005), a statistically significant reduction in PCI mortality (8.5% vs 4.3% p<0.01) and a non-significant reduction in mortality overall amongst all treatment pathways (9.69% vs 9.43%, p=0.931).

Identifiers

PMID34912998
PMCPMC8657047
OpenAlexW3217335977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.