Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912881›Full record

ReviewERJ open research2021

Individual trajectory-based care for COPD: getting closer, but not there yet.

Nicolas Roche, Philippe Devillier, Patrick Berger, Arnaud Bourdin, Daniel Dusser, Jean-François Muir, Yan Martinat, Philippe Terrioux, Bruno Housset

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas RochePneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre - Université de Paris, Institut Cochin (UMR1016), Paris, France.
Philippe DevillierUPRES EA 220, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Pôle des Maladies des Voies Respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Patrick BergerService d'exploration fonctionnelle respiratoire, CIC 1401, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-0343
Arnaud BourdinDépartement de Pneumologie et Addictologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4645-5209
Daniel DusserPneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre - Université de Paris, Institut Cochin (UMR1016), Paris, France.
Jean-François MuirService de Pneumologie, Oncologie Thoracique et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France.
Yan MartinatPneumologie, Centre Médical Parot, Lyon, France.
Philippe TerriouxPneumologie, Meaux, France.
Bruno HoussetService de Pneumologie, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a main cause of death due to interplaying factors, including comorbidities that interfere with symptoms and response to therapy. It is now admitted that COPD management should be based on clinical symptoms and health status and should consider the heterogeneity of patients' phenotypes and treatable traits. This precision medicine approach involves a regular assessment of the patient's status and of the expected benefits and risks of therapy. The cornerstone of COPD pharmacological therapy is inhaled long-acting bronchodilation. In patients with persistent or worsened symptoms, factors likely to interfere with treatment efficacy include the patient's non-adherence to therapy, treatment preference, inhaler misuse and/or comorbidities, which should be systematically investigated before escalation is considered. Several comorbidities are known to impact symptoms, physical and social activity and lung function. The possible long-term side-effects of inhaled corticosteroids contrasting with their over-prescription in COPD patients justify the regular assessment of their benefits and risks, and de-escalation under close monitoring after a sufficient period of stability is to be considered. While commonly used in clinical trials, the relevance of routine blood eosinophil counts to guide therapy adjustment is not fully clear. Patients' characteristics, which define phenotypes and treatable traits and thus guide therapy, often change during life, forming the basis of the concept of clinical trajectory. The application of individual trajectory-based management of COPD in clinical practice therefore implies that the benefit:risk ratio is regularly reviewed according to the evolution of the patient's traits over time to allow optimised therapy adjustments.

Identifiers

PMID34912881
PMCPMC8666575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.