ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2021
Advanced Vascular Access in Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of vein characteristics and operator experience on intravenous catheter insertion success in cats in an emergency room.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The cephalic vein is readily accessible for vascular access in pediatric patients less than 12 weeks presenting to an emergency room.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Euthanasia of Cats by Australian Veterinarians: A Survey of Current Practices.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of placement characteristics using two intraosseous devices in canine and feline cadavers by novice users.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Intraosseous Regional Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.JB & JS open accessArticle
- Feasibility of Near-Infrared Image Guided Vascular Identification and Access in Dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Teaching Clinical Competency: Evaluating POCUS-Guided Versus Landmark Techniques for Thoracostomy Tube Placement in Canine Cadavers by Veterinary Students.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In canine and feline patients presenting in a state of hemodynamic collapse, obtaining vascular access can be challenging. Delays in achieving vascular access interfere with delivery of patient care. In human medicine, definitions of difficult vascular access are variable and include the need for multiple placement attempts or involvement of specialized teams and equipment. Incidence and risk factors for difficult vascular access have not been well studied in veterinary patients, which limits understanding of how best to address this issue. Alternatives to percutaneous peripheral or central intravenous catheterization in dogs and cats include venous cutdowns, umbilical access in newborns, corpus cavernosum access in males, ultrasound-guided catheterization, and intraosseous catheterization. In recent years, advances in ultrasonography and intraosseous access techniques have made these more accessible to veterinary practitioners. These vascular access techniques are reviewed here, along with advantages, limitations, and areas for future study of each technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.