Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Ruth Gutierrez-AguilarDivisión de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Bernadette E GraysonDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomical Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States.
Dong-Hoon KimDepartment of Pharmacology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Suma YalamanchiliCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Mario L CalcagnoLaboratorio de Fisicoquímica e Ingeniería de Proteínas, Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Stephen C WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Randy J SeeleyNorth Campus Research Complex, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXKorea University · KRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US
Funding
University of Michigan Center for Gastrointestinal ResearchP30DK034933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI OMARY, BISHR · 1986 to 2021
$22.5M
High Fat Diet-Induced ObesityP01DK056863 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WOODS, STEPHEN C · 2001 to 2010
$12.0M
INSULIN AND CNS CONTROL OF BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD INTAKER01DK017844 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WOODS, STEPHEN C · 1986 to 2013
$3.8M
REGULATORY RESPONSES TO POSITIVE ENERGY BALANCER01DK054080 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SEELEY, RANDY J. · 1997 to 2006
$1.6M
INSULIN AND CNS CONTROL OF BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD INTAKER37DK017844 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WOODS, STEPHEN C · 1993 to 2000
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
CNS GNPDA2 Does Not Control Appetite, but Regulates Glucose Homeostasis. · full record | OpenQuestion