ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021
It Cuts Both Ways: An Annelid Model System for the Study of Regeneration in the Laboratory and in the Classroom.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The behavioral, physiological, and biochemical responses of Lumbriculus variegatus exposed to cannabidiol and its metabolites.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2025Article
- Regeneration of Lumbriculus variegatus requires post-amputation production of reactive oxygen species.Development, growth & differentiation · 2025Article
- DHEA inhibits regeneration inmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
- SoxC and MmpReg promote blastema formation in whole-body regeneration of fragmenting potworms Enchytraeus japonensis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Regenerative inflammation: When immune cells help to re-build tissues.The FEBS journal · 2024Review
- Worm blobs as entangled living polymers: from topological active matter to flexible soft robot collectives.Soft matter · 2023Review
- Cell Proliferation Indices in RegeneratingCells · 2023Article
- Oxygenation-Controlled Collective Dynamics in Aquatic Worm Blobs.Integrative and comparative biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanisms supporting regeneration and successful recovery of function have fascinated scientists and the general public for quite some time, with the earliest description of regeneration occurring in the 8th century BC through the Greek mythological story of Prometheus. While most animals demonstrate the capacity for wound-healing, the ability to initiate a developmental process that leads to a partial or complete replacement of a lost structure varies widely among animal taxa. Variation also occurs within single species based on the nature and location of the wound and the developmental stage or age of the individual. Comparative studies of cellular and molecular changes that occur both during, and following, wound healing may point to conserved genomic pathways among animals of different regenerative capacity. Such insights could revolutionize studies within the field of regenerative medicine. In this review, we focus on several closely related species of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.