Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912668›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2021

Reconstruction of Heel Soft Tissue Defects: An Algorithm Based on Our Experience.

Deepak Krishna, Gaurav Chaturvedi, Manal M Khan, Ved Prakash Rao Cheruvu, Michael Laitonjam, Reena Minz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reverse sural artery flap for lower extremity reconstruction: a multicenter retrospective analysis of success and failure patterns.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepak KrishnaDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Gaurav ChaturvediDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Manal M KhanDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Ved Prakash Rao CheruvuDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Michael LaitonjamDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Reena MinzDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensory recovery and durability of the flap is the primary goal of heel soft tissue reconstruction. From the different options, the choice of the flap depends on the size of the defect, its location, and the availability of the donor area.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 40 patients having heel defects were included from Jan 2016 to Dec 2018 in which different flaps were used for the reconstruction. The outcome was evaluated in terms of flap survival, recovery of sensation, the durability of coverage, and functional denouement. We also analysed the outcome between neuropathic and non-neuropathic ulcers of the heel.

resultsOut of 40 patients' medial plantar artery islanded flap was performed in eight cases, extended reverse sural flap in 16 cases, islanded reverse sural flap in six cases, local flaps in six cases, cross-leg flap in two cases, and free Latissimus Dorsi muscle flaps with Skin Graft cover in two cases. The patients were observed for a mean follow-up time of 15 months (12-20 months). Only two flaps showed marginal necrosis as an immediate complication. The majority of the flaps were tenacious in the follow-up period except for the six flaps that developed delayed ulceration. Return of protective sensation (P=0.006) and mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society subjective score (P=0.025) was significantly higher in the non-neuropathic ulcer group.

conclusionLocoregional flaps can cover most of the heel defects with a satisfactory outcome. The functional outcome was lower in the reconstructed neuropathic heel ulcer group.

Indexed as

Calcaneal osteomyelitisExtended reverse sural artery flapHeel defectHeel reconstructionMedial plantar artery flap

Identifiers

PMID34912668
PMCPMC8662685
OpenAlexW4286993504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.