Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912627›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Immunohistochemical Markers in Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital.

Rakesh Ba, Venkata Pavan Kumar Karanam, Ashishkumar B Mundada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rakesh BaGeneral Surgery, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences (DM WIMS), Wayanad, IND.
Venkata Pavan Kumar KaranamGeneral Surgery, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Hospital (ESIC MCH), Hyderabad, IND.
Ashishkumar B MundadaGeneral Surgery, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences (DM WIMS), Wayanad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The incidence of breast cancer in India is on the rise, and it is now the most common cancer affecting women in India. The main objective of our study was to estimate the prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in our study population and compare the various clinicopathological characteristics of TNBC with those of non-TNBC in these patients. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among 249 cases of female breast cancer who reported to a tertiary care hospital in Southern India from September 2017 to September 2021. Results The mean age at presentation was 52 years (range: 26-82 years). The prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer was 19.7%. Most of the subjects belonged to the age group of 40-60 years. The majority were with grade 2 and 3 diseases. Of the cases, 50.6% were estrogen receptor (ER) positive and 48.2% were progesterone receptor (PR) positive, and 40.1% were HER2/neu positive. Conclusion The prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer in our study population is 19.7%, which is in concordance with the literature. Large tumor size, high-grade tumors, and a higher rate of axillary lymph node metastasis are characteristic features of TNBC. TNBC are tumors with aggressive tumor biology and are associated with poor prognosis.

Indexed as

breast cancerestrogen receptorher2/neu proteinimmunohistochemistryprogesterone receptortriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID34912627
PMCPMC8664371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.