ArticleCureus2021
Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Nephropathy: A Clinicopathologic Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary aetiology of glomerulonephritis worldwide, and it is the most important type in terms of morbidity and mortality. IgAN involves the deposition of immune bodies in the mesangial cells of the kidney, which causes renal glomerular damage, haematuria, proteinuria, and various other symptoms. Previous studies have mainly focused on the East Asian population, with few studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the western region. The diagnosis requires a biopsy, which should be examined by an expert and classified according to the Oxford classification system.
objectivesAnalyze the clinical, pathological, and laboratory features of male and female patients diagnosed with IgAN at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a retrospective record review conducted at KAUH in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between May-June 2021. The study included 18 patients diagnosed with IgAN by biopsy, and their clinical, laboratory and pathological data were evaluated and classified according to the Oxford classification system.
resultsDemographic data revealed a male predominance of 66.7%. The most common pathological finding was mesangial proliferation, and the most common presentation was haematuria. For treatment options, corticosteroids were the most prescribed drugs. A significant relationship was found between IgAN with increased serum creatinine and male sex (P = 0.017). Additionally, a significant relationship was observed between decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in IgAN and the male sex (P = 0.006).
conclusionsWe found a difference in terms of pathological, clinical and laboratory presentations of IgAN between males and females. Men generally had worse kidney function at presentation and advanced Oxford classification in their kidney biopsies compared to women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.