Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912490›Full record

ArticleCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2021

Online Educational Tools for Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Scoping Literature Review.

Richard Sztramko, Anthony J Levinson, Andrea E Wurster, Rita Jezrawi, Branavan Sivapathasundaram, Alexandra Papaioannou, David Cowan, Joye St Onge, Sharon Marr, Christopher Patterson and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Participant perspectives on online interventions for diverse caregivers of persons living with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard SztramkoDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Anthony J LevinsonDivision of e-Learning Innovation, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Andrea E WursterGERAS Centre, St. Peter's Hospital, Hamilton.
Rita JezrawiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Branavan SivapathasundaramGERAS Centre, St. Peter's Hospital, Hamilton.
Alexandra PapaioannouDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
David CowanDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Joye St OngeDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Sharon MarrDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Christopher PattersonDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Tricia WooDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Lori MoscaDivision of e-Learning Innovation, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton.
Cynthia LokkerDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
McMaster University · CAImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal caregivers of people with dementia provide the majority of health-based care to people with dementia. Providing this care requires knowledge and access to resources, which caregivers often do not receive. We set out to evaluate the effect of online educational tools on informal caregiver self-efficacy, quality of life, burden/stress, depression, and anxiety, and to identify effective processes for online educational tool development.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of articles on online educational interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia searching CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed from 1990 to March 2018, with an updated search conducted in 2020. The identified articles were screened and the data were charted.

results33 articles that reported on 24 interventions were included. There is some evidence that online interventions improve caregiver-related outcomes such as self-efficacy, depression, dementia knowledge, and quality of life; and decrease caregiver burden. Common findings across the studies included the need for tailored, stage-specific information applicable to the caregiver's situation and the use of psychosocial techniques to develop the knowledge components of the interventions.

conclusionWe demonstrate the importance of having caregivers and health-care professionals involved at all stages of tool conceptualization and development. Online tools should be evaluated with robust trials that focus on how increased knowledge and development approaches affect caregiver-related outcomes.

Indexed as

caregiverdementiaeducationaleHealthonline interventionsupport services

Identifiers

PMID34912490
PMCPMC8629496
OpenAlexW3216196371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.