Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912449›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

A Computer-Aided Diagnosis System Using Deep Learning for Multiclass Skin Lesion Classification.

Mehak Arshad, Muhammad Attique Khan, Usman Tariq, Ammar Armghan, Fayadh Alenezi, Muhammad Younus Javed, Shabnam Mohamed Aslam, Seifedine Kadry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehak ArshadDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University Taxila, Taxila, Pakistan.
Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University Taxila, Taxila, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-0715
Usman TariqCollege of Computer Engineering and Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharaj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-1187
Ammar ArmghanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka 75471, Saudi Arabia.
Fayadh AleneziDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka 75471, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4099-1254
Muhammad Younus JavedDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University Taxila, Taxila, Pakistan.
Shabnam Mohamed AslamDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9015-7551
Seifedine KadryFaculty of Applied Computing and Technology, Noroff University College, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the USA, each year, almost 5.4 million people are diagnosed with skin cancer. Melanoma is one of the most dangerous types of skin cancer, and its survival rate is 5%. The development of skin cancer has risen over the last couple of years. Early identification of skin cancer can help reduce the human mortality rate. Dermoscopy is a technology used for the acquisition of skin images. However, the manual inspection process consumes more time and required much cost. The recent development in the area of deep learning showed significant performance for classification tasks. In this research work, a new automated framework is proposed for multiclass skin lesion classification. The proposed framework consists of a series of steps. In the first step, augmentation is performed. For the augmentation process, three operations are performed: rotate 90, right-left flip, and up and down flip. In the second step, deep models are fine-tuned. Two models are opted, such as ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, and updated their layers. In the third step, transfer learning is applied to train both fine-tuned deep models on augmented datasets. In the succeeding stage, features are extracted and performed fusion using a modified serial-based approach. Finally, the fused vector is further enhanced by selecting the best features using the skewness-controlled SVR approach. The final selected features are classified using several machine learning algorithms and selected based on the accuracy value. In the experimental process, the augmented HAM10000 dataset is used and achieved an accuracy of 91.7%. Moreover, the performance of the augmented dataset is better as compared to the original imbalanced dataset. In addition, the proposed method is compared with some recent studies and shows improved performance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMelanomaComputersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34912449
PMCPMC8668359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.