Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912390›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Comparison of clinical efficacy of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing in treating tibial shaft fractures.

Zhonglian Zhu, Zhaodong Wang, Pinghui Zhou, Xuyi Wang, Jianzhong Guan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach intramedullary nailing for tibal shaft fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhonglian ZhuZhonglian Zhu, Anhui Key Laboratory of Tissue Transformation, Bengbu Medical College, Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, P.R. China.
Zhaodong WangZhaodong Wang, Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, P.R. China.
Pinghui ZhouPinghui Zhou, Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, P.R. China.
Xuyi WangXuyi Wang, Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, P.R. China.
Jianzhong GuanJianzhong Guan, Anhui Key Laboratory of Tissue Transformation, Bengbu Medical College, Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, P.R. China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare clinical efficacies of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing approaches in treating tibial shaft fractures.

methodsPatients (n=110) admitted with tibial shaft fractures in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020, who underwent procedures with internal fixation intramedullary nails, were retrospectively divided into suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach groups (n = 55 each) based on the surgical method used for fracture repair. The clinical and functional outcomes of the knee were assessed six months after the surgery.

resultsSix months after the operation, the pooled value for excellent and good efficacy rates in the suprapatellar approach group, as indicated by Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee scoring system, was 90.91%, which was significantly higher than that in the infrapatellar approach group (76.36%). The degree of pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) score) of the patients in the suprapatellar approach group was over 2-fold lower than in the infrapatellar approach group (P < 0.001).The Lysholm knee score, range of motion (ROM), SF-36p, and SF-36M scores in the suprapatellar approach group were significantly higher than those in the infrapatellar approach group (P < 0.001).

conclusionSuprapatellar approach had significantly higher clinical efficiency than infrapatellar approach, and can significantly reduce the degree of pain, promote the recovery of patients with knee joint involvement, improve the physical and psychological well-being, reduce the number of cases of postoperative delayed healing.

Indexed as

Infrapatellar approachIntramedullary nailSuprapatellar approachTibial shaft fracture

Identifiers

PMID34912390
PMCPMC8613067
OpenAlexW3204029646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.