Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912358›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Number of Candidate Effector Genes in Accessory Genomes Differentiates Pathogenic From Endophytic

Maria E Constantin, Like Fokkens, Mara de Sain, Frank L W Takken, Martijn Rep

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptomic Differences Between TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Genetic and Pathogenic Differentiation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The endophyteFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. How genomics can help unravel the evolution of endophytic fungi.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Fungal effectors: past, present, and future.Current opinion in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Pathogenicity Differentiation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbial diversity in soils suppressive toFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  19. Fungal Effectoromics: A World in Constant Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria E ConstantinMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Like FokkensMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mara de SainMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frank L W TakkenMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn RepMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungus

Indexed as

comparative genomicseffectorsendophyteFusarium oxysporumminiature transposable elementpathogen

Identifiers

PMID34912358
PMCPMC8666634
OpenAlexW3217678676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.