ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
Comparative diagnosis of premature rupture of membrane by nitrazine test, urea, and creatinine estimation.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers for Pregnancy Latency Prediction after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Active versus expectant management for premature rupture of membranes at term: A randomized, controlled study.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Trial
- A Prospective Study on the Metabolic and Hormonal Outcomes of SGLT2 Inhibitor Combination Therapy With and Without Metformin in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Integrated Immunoaffinity Extraction, Solid-Phase Extraction, and Fluorescent Labeling of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.Precision chemistry · 2025Article
- Revisiting the human umbilical cord epithelium. An atypical epithelial sheath with distinctive features.Cell and tissue research · 2024Article
- Recent Advances and Challenges in the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Preterm Labor.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study compared the reliability of nitrazine, urea, and creatinine in the diagnosis of premature rupture of membrane (PROM). Nitrazine strip measures pH levels while urea and creatinine are produced mainly in amniotic fluid and not in the maternal vagina.
methodsSixty-four pregnant women with demonstrable passage or pooling of liquor par vaginum on speculum examination and 64 with no liquor drainage at 28-42 weeks gestation were studied. Vaginal fluid aspirates from both groups of patient were tested for urea, creatinine, and pH levels using nitrazine strip. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine cutoff values for urea and creatinine. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23.0 and setting statistical significance at
resultsNitrazine test showed high level of specificity (100%) but a sensitivity of 87.5%. Predictive ability of urea at >12.7 mg/dl obtained as cutoff value from the ROC curve showed a sensitivity of 19.64% and specificity of 94.44% while for creatinine the cutoff value was at >0.8 mg/dl with sensitivity of 48.21% and specificity of 65.28%.
conclusionNitrazine strip was the most reliable of the three in the diagnosis of PROM. This was followed by creatinine and then urea. In view of the gaps in sensitivity and accuracy and the importance of precise diagnosis to prevent maternal and fetal complications, there is still the need to find other affordable, more sensitive and more accurate biochemical marker/s that will help in diagnosing PROM especially in difficult cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34912184PMC8589831W3208323078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.