ArticleBreeding science2021
Targeted genome modifications in cereal crops.
Article in Breeding science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rapid development of naked malting barley germplasm through targeted mutagenesis.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025Article
- A guide to barley mutants.Hereditas · 2024Review
- Form follows function in Triticeae inflorescences.Breeding science · 2023Article
- Novel resistance to the Bymovirus BaMMV established by targeted mutagenesis of the PDIL5-1 susceptibility gene in barley.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Barley stripe mosaic virus-mediated somatic and heritable gene editing in barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Impact of ultrasonication applications on color profile of foods.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2022Review
- CRISPR-Cas technology opens a new era for the creation of novel maize germplasms.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Regulation of germination by targeted mutagenesis of grain dormancy genes in barley.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Genome Editing Targets for Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency and Nutrient Stress Adaptation.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Functional Validation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent advent of customizable endonucleases has led to remarkable advances in genetic engineering, as these molecular scissors allow for the targeted introduction of mutations or even precisely predefined genetic modifications into virtually any genomic target site of choice. Thanks to its unprecedented precision, efficiency, and functional versatility, this technology, commonly referred to as genome editing, has become an effective force not only in basic research devoted to the elucidation of gene function, but also for knowledge-based improvement of crop traits. Among the different platforms currently available for site-directed genome modifications, RNA-guided clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) endonucleases have proven to be the most powerful. This review provides an application-oriented overview of the development of customizable endonucleases, current approaches to cereal crop breeding, and future opportunities in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.