ReviewSeminars in hearing2021
Defining Disparities in Cochlear Implantation through the Social Determinants of Health.
Review in Seminars in hearing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Living with Cochlear Implants (LivCI): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of personal factors associated with living with cochlear implants.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Observational
- Determinants of Cochlear Implant Evaluation Completion and Uptake in Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Investigating Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Disparities Through the County Health Rankings System.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Equal access to treatment for hearing loss in Chile: do all people have the same opportunities to receive appropriate treatment? A scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Device Use Among Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Promoting health equity through cross-sector strategies: the integration of communication public health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Advancing Educational Equity for Children with Hearing Loss: Celebrating the 50ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025Article
- Trends in pediatric cochlear implants: The dual impact of COVID-19 and Lebanon's crisis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities associated with access to cochlear implantation for severe-to-profound hearing loss: A multicentre observational study of UK adults.PLoS medicine · 2024Observational
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Overcoming developing-world challenges in cochlear implantation: A Nigerian perspective.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Exposure to Spoken Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Children With Cochlear Implants.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- [Cochlear implantation in Senegal: challenges, limits and perspectives].The Pan African medical journal · 2023Article
- A country-wide health policy in Chile for deaf adults using cochlear implants: Analysis of health determinants and social impacts.PloS one · 2023Article
- Cochlear Implant Awareness in the United States: A National Survey of 15,138 Adults.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Impact of the ACEMg Biomedicine on Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Function: Analysis of Real-World Clinical Data.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
- Transforming Access to Hearing Care: Community Perspectives on School-Based Telehealth in Rural Appalachia.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing loss is a global public health problem with high prevalence and profound impacts on health. Cochlear implantation (CI) is a well-established evidence-based treatment for hearing loss; however, there are significant disparities in utilization, access, and clinical outcomes among different populations. While variations in CI outcomes are influenced by innate biological differences, a wide array of social, environmental, and economic factors significantly impact optimal outcomes. These differences in hearing health are rooted in inequities of health-related socioeconomic resources. To define disparities and advance equity in CI, there is a pressing need to understand and target these social factors that influence equitable outcomes, access, and utilization. These factors can be categorized according to the widely accepted framework of social determinants of health, which include the following domains: healthcare access/quality, education access/quality, social and community context, economic stability, and neighborhood and physical environment. This article defines these domains in the context of CI and examines the published research and the gaps in research of each of these domains. Further consideration is given to how these factors can influence equity in CI and how to incorporate this information in the evaluation and management of patients receiving cochlear implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.