ReviewSeminars in hearing2021
Barriers to Adult Cochlear Implant Care in the United States: An Analysis of Health Care Delivery.
Review in Seminars in hearing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Observational
- Advancing clinical utility of artificial intelligence: lessons from developing a model to predict cochlear implant eligibility.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a De-Escalated Post-Operative Cochlear Implant Programming Protocol.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Proposed Development of a New Staging System for Hearing Loss: Countermeasure 2 of the Hearing Health Collaborative.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026Article
- Trends in Adult Cochlear Implant Access and Uptake Across Ten Years of Reported Data.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Advancing Pediatric Cochlear Implant Care Through a Multidisciplinary Telehealth Model: Insights from Implementation and Family Perspectives.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient Navigators in Cochlear Implant Services: A Survey of Current Practices and Utilization.Otology & neurotology open · 2025Article
- Cochlear Implants and Adult Patient Experiences, Adaptation and Challenges: A Survey.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Article
- Single-dose genome editing therapy rescues auditory and vestibular functions in adult mice with DFNA41 deafness.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Remote Programming of Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Clinical Trial Results.Otology & neurotology open · 2025Article
- Cochlear Implantation in the United Arab Emirates: Otolaryngologists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Utilization of the Spanish Bisyllable Word Recognition Test to Assess Cochlear Implant Performance Trajectory.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Validating an Evoked Potential Platform for Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Preliminary Evidence to Support a De-Escalated Cochlear Implant Programming Paradigm for New Adult Recipients: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Hearing health care access for adult cochlear implant candidates and recipients: Travel time and socioeconomic status.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent underutilization of cochlear implants (CIs) in the United States is in part a reflection of a lack of hearing health knowledge and the complexities of care delivery in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. An evaluation of the patient experience through the CI health care delivery process systematically exposes barriers that must be overcome to undergo treatment for moderate-to-severe hearing loss. This review analyzes patient-facing obstacles including diagnosis of hearing loss, CI candidate identification and referral to surgeon, CI evaluation and candidacy criteria interpretation, and lastly CI surgery and rehabilitation. Pervasive throughout the process are several themes which demand attention in addressing inequities in hearing health disparities in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.