Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34912078›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2022

Environmental factors in declining human fertility.

Niels E Skakkebæk, Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen, Hagai Levine, Anna-Maria Andersson, Niels Jørgensen, Katharina M Main, Øjvind Lidegaard, Lærke Priskorn, Stine A Holmboe, Elvira V Bräuner and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Homo sapiens, industrialisation and the environmental mismatch hypothesis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Niels E SkakkebækDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Niels.Erik.Skakkebaek@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-8020
Rune Lindahl-JacobsenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Hagai LevineSchool of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Anna-Maria AnderssonDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-1659
Niels JørgensenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-0838
Katharina M MainDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Øjvind LidegaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lærke PriskornDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stine A HolmboeDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elvira V BräunerDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-4796
Kristian AlmstrupDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1832-0307
Luiz R FrancaDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ariana ZnaorCancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-4782
Andreas KortenkampDivision of Environmental Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9729
Roger J HartDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-3040
Anders JuulDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A severe decline in child births has occurred over the past half century, which will lead to considerable population declines, particularly in industrialized regions. A crucial question is whether this decline can be explained by economic and behavioural factors alone, as suggested by demographic reports, or to what degree biological factors are also involved. Here, we discuss data suggesting that human reproductive health is deteriorating in industrialized regions. Widespread infertility and the need for assisted reproduction due to poor semen quality and/or oocyte failure are now major health issues. Other indicators of declining reproductive health include a worldwide increasing incidence in testicular cancer among young men and alterations in twinning frequency. There is also evidence of a parallel decline in rates of legal abortions, revealing a deterioration in total conception rates. Subtle alterations in fertility rates were already visible around 1900, and most industrialized regions now have rates below levels required to sustain their populations. We hypothesize that these reproductive health problems are partially linked to increasing human exposures to chemicals originating directly or indirectly from fossil fuels. If the current infertility epidemic is indeed linked to such exposures, decisive regulatory action underpinned by unconventional, interdisciplinary research collaborations will be needed to reverse the trends.

Indexed as

InfertilityTesticular NeoplasmsFemaleFertilityHumansMalePregnancyReproductionSemen Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.