Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911990›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Determinants of falls after stroke based on data on 5065 patients from the Swedish Väststroke and Riksstroke Registers.

Carina U Persson, Per-Olof Hansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carina U PerssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 3rd Fl, Gothenburg, Sweden. carina.persson@neuro.gu.se.
Per-Olof HanssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to identify determinants in acute stroke that are associated with falls during the stroke unit stay. In order to enable individualized preventive actions, this knowledge is fundamental. Based on local and national quality register data on an unselected sample of 5065 stroke patients admitted to a stroke unit at a Swedish university hospital, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. The dependent variable was any fall during stroke unit stay. The independent variables related to function, activity, personal factors, time to assessment, comorbidities and treatments. Determinants of falls were: being male (odds ratio (OR) 2.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.79-2.84), haemorrhagic stroke (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.86), moderate stroke symptoms according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS score 2-5 vs. NIHSS score 0-1) (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08-1.90), smoking (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.25), impaired postural control in walking (OR 4.61, 95% CI 3.29-6.46), impaired postural control in standing (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25-2.05), stroke-related arm- and hand problems, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.91), impaired cognition (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.95), and urinary tract infection (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.43-2.56). The findings from this study are useful in clinical practice and might help to improve patient safety after stroke.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPostural BalancePublic Health SurveillanceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesStrokeSwedenYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34911990
PMCPMC8674218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.