ArticleLupus science & medicine2021
Evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction in SLE.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Montreal Cognitive Assessment at the Framingham Heart Study: A Re-Examination of the Norms.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Cognitive Screening and Neuropsychological Evaluation in Children and Young Adults With Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Survey of Rheumatologists.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Virtual reality-based cognitive assessment tools for mild cognitive impairment screening: comparison with traditional paper-and-pencil-based cognitive assessment tools.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Burden and determinants of cognitive impairment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre in South India.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of MRI-based brain oxygen extraction fraction mapping in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- Alterations in cerebral perfusion and corresponding brain functional networks in systemic lupus erythematosus with cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric lupus.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- Article
- Cognitive dysfunction in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: current knowledge and future directions.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024Review
- Clinical associations of cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCognitive dysfunction in SLE is common and associated with significant morbidity but is currently underdetected. Early detection requires the use of screening tests, as formal diagnostic cognitive testing is time-consuming. This study aims to evaluate the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening tool for cognitive dysfunction in SLE.
methodsPatients with SLE (n=95) and demographically matched healthy control participants (n=48) underwent cognitive testing using the 1-hour neuropsychiatric test battery recommended by the American College of Rheumatology for use in SLE and the MoCA. We used regression analyses to determine associations between MoCA and cognitive test scores. We assessed several MoCA cut-offs for predicting cognitive impairment in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Receiver operating curve analyses were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA cut-off thresholds.
resultsWe found a significant correlation between MoCA score and 9 of the 10 cognitive endpoints studied (all p<0.001). Receiver operating curve analysis suggested that a MoCA cut-off of <27 had highest diagnostic accuracy across the cognitive impairment definitions (area under the curve 0.76-0.78). Using a screening cut-off of <28, the MoCA had sensitivity of 83%-94% and specificity of 46%-59%, depending on the impairment definition used.
conclusionsThe MoCA correlates strongly with cognitive test results in SLE and has sufficient sensitivity for use as a screening tool with a cut-off of <28 as the optimal threshold. This tool can be incorporated into clinical practice for screening for cognitive dysfunction in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.