ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2022
Cellular-Resolution Imaging of Bystander Payload Tissue Penetration from Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Structure-Activity Relationships of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Systematic Review of Chemistry on the Trastuzumab Scaffold.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2022Pooled it
- Synthetic biology of oncolytic bacteria: Comparative microbial chassis and precise killing strategies.Toxicology reports · 2026Review
- Exploring the immunological effects of antibody-drug conjugates.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances and Future Directions in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Paradigm Shifts to Data-Driven Design.Cancers · 2026Review
- Exatecan Payload-Based Antibody-Drug Conjugates with a Short Hydrophilic Cleavable Linker.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Agent-based modeling demonstrates how target-independent processes supplement killing by antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A bispecific nanobody-drug conjugate targeting TROP2 and c-Met for low-concentration, single-dose treatment of pancreatic cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- In Vivo Auto-tuning of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Delivery to Maximize Efficacy Using High-Avidity, Low-Affinity Antibodies.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- Bispecific antibody-drug conjugates: a modular blueprint for next-generation cancer therapeutics.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Engineering the Future of ADCs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Innovative use of therapeutic antibodies in lung cancer: the current landscape of ADCs and other antibody-based therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Spatial PK-PD mismatch in tumor-targeting antibodies and ADCs: from lesion access to pharmacologic execution.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to antibody-drug conjugates in bladder cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Maximizing activity and selectivity of antibody-mediated effector functions using antibody mixtures.mAbs · 2025Article
- Unveiling the molecular and immunological drivers of antibody-drug conjugates in cancer treatment.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Advances in Techniques for the Structure and Functional Optimization of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Exploring Experimental and In Silico Approaches for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After several notable clinical failures in early generations, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have made significant gains with seven new FDA approvals within the last 3 years. These successes have been driven by a shift towards mechanistically informed ADC design, where the payload, linker, drug-to-antibody ratio, and conjugation are increasingly tailored to a specific target and clinical indication. However, fundamental aspects needed for design, such as payload distribution, remain incompletely understood. Payloads are often classified as "bystander" or "nonbystander" depending on their ability to diffuse out of targeted cells into adjacent cells that may be antigen-negative or more distant from tumor vessels, helping to overcome heterogeneous distribution. Seven of the 11 FDA-approved ADCs employ these bystander payloads, but the depth of penetration and cytotoxic effects as a function of physicochemical properties and mechanism of action have not been fully characterized. Here, we utilized tumor spheroids and pharmacodynamic marker staining to quantify tissue penetration of the three major classes of agents: microtubule inhibitors, DNA-damaging agents, and topoisomerase inhibitors. PAMPA data and coculture assays were performed to compare with the 3D tissue culture data. The results demonstrate a spectrum in bystander potential and tissue penetration depending on the physicochemical properties and potency of the payload. Generally, directly targeted cells show a greater response even with bystander payloads, consistent with the benefit of deeper ADC tissue penetration. These results are compared with computational simulations to help scale the data from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.