Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911812›Full record

ArticleRMD open2021

Neuropathic pain in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort: prevalence and phenotyping.

Eefje Martine van Helvoort, Paco M J Welsing, Mylène P Jansen, Willem Paul Gielis, Marieke Loef, Margreet Kloppenburg, Francisco Blanco, Ida K Haugen, Francis Berenbaum, Anne-C Bay-Jensen and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03883568 (A 2-year Multicentre, EU, Exploratory Study Without Therapeutic Benefit in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis to Describe, Validate, and Predict Phenotypes of Knee Osteoarthritis by Use of Clinical, Imaging, and Biochemical), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03883568 completednot on this map

A 2-year Multicentre, EU, Exploratory Study Without Therapeutic Benefit in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis to Describe, Validate, and Predict Phenotypes of Knee Osteoarthritis by Use of Clinical, Imaging, and Biochemical (Bio)Markers.

TypeobservationalSponsorF.P.J.G. LafeberRan2018 to 2021Enrolled297ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Eefje Martine van HelvoortRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands E.M.vanHelvoort-3@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-4892
Paco M J WelsingRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mylène P JansenRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1929-6350
Willem Paul GielisOrthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-4808
Marieke LoefRheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4301-8350
Margreet KloppenburgRheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Francisco BlancoServicio de Reumatologia, INIBIC-Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Ida K HaugenDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-2216
Francis BerenbaumRheumatology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-7815
Anne-C Bay-JensenNordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark.
Christoph LadelBioBone BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnes LalandeInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Jonathan LarkinGlaxoSmithKline USA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John LoughlinMusculoskeletal Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ali MobasheriResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6261-1286
Harrie WeinansOrthopedics, UMC Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floris LafeberRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niels EijkelkampCenter for Translational Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simon MastbergenRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USInserm · FRNewcastle University · GBNordic Bioscience (Denmark) · DKServier (France) · FRState Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOsteoarthritis (OA) patients with a neuropathic pain (NP) component may represent a specific phenotype. This study compares joint damage, pain and functional disability between knee OA patients with a likely NP component, and those without a likely NP component.

methodsBaseline data from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway knee OA cohort study were used. Patients with a painDETECT score ≥19 (with likely NP component, n=24) were matched on a 1:2 ratio to patients with a painDETECT score ≤12 (without likely NP component), and similar knee and general pain (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain and Short Form 36 pain). Pain, physical function and radiographic joint damage of multiple joints were determined and compared between OA patients with and without a likely NP component.

resultsOA patients with painDETECT scores ≥19 had statistically significant less radiographic joint damage (p≤0.04 for Knee Images Digital Analysis parameters and Kellgren and Lawrence grade), but an impaired physical function (p<0.003 for all tests) compared with patients with a painDETECT score ≤12. In addition, more severe pain was found in joints other than the index knee (p≤0.001 for hips and hands), while joint damage throughout the body was not different.

conclusionsOA patients with a likely NP component, as determined with the painDETECT questionnaire, may represent a specific OA phenotype, where local and overall joint damage is not the main cause of pain and disability. Patients with this NP component will likely not benefit from general pain medication and/or disease-modifying OA drug (DMOAD) therapy. Reserved inclusion of these patients in DMOAD trials is advised in the quest for successful OA treatments.Trial registration numberThe study is registered under clinicaltrials.gov nr: NCT03883568.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaOsteoarthritis, KneeCohort StudiesHumansKnee JointPrevalenceknee osteoarthritispatient reported outcome measurestherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID34911812
PMCPMC8679113
OpenAlexW4200098206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.