Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911788›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Sex Differences in BNST and Amygdala Activation by Contextual, Cued, and Unpredictable Threats.

Louise Urien, Elizabeth P Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deletion ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Sex-specific relationships between stress coping and avoidance behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Deletion ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Merkel cell stimulation in fear and sensory signaling.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex Differences in Neural Circuits Underlying Fear Processing.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Growth Hormone Action in Somatostatin Neurons Regulates Anxiety and Fear Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louise UrienDepartments of Biology and Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Elizabeth P BauerDepartments of Biology and Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 ebauer@barnard.edu.
Barnard College · US

Funding

Modulation of fear conditioning by extended amygdala circuitsR15MH107008 · NIMH · BARNARD COLLEGE · PI BAUER, ELIZABETH P · 2016 to 2016
$411k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH107008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear and anxiety can be described as emotional and physical responses to predictable and unpredictable threats. While the amygdala is necessary for context and cued fear conditioning, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is important for anxiety-like behavior and conditioned responses to diffuse and/or unpredictable threats. However, we still lack knowledge about how the BNST and amygdala nuclei act in coordination. Moreover, the incidence of anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is substantially higher in women than in men, but most studies of fear conditioning are conducted in male rodents. Here, we asked whether the BNST and the lateral, basal, and central nuclei of the amygdala are active during the expression of fear conditioning in male and female rats using FOS immunohistochemistry. We first show that the BNST is indeed involved in context fear expression in males, but not in females. The lateral amygdala was active in both sexes during context fear expression. We next trained animals using tone cues paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US), or tone cues which were unpaired with the US, and thus nonpredictive. Females displayed greater fear expression to these unpaired tones than males. FOS was upregulated in both the BNST and the basal amygdala during fear expression to unpaired tones in both sexes. The differential processing of fear responses by males and females highlights the need to acknowledge sex differences in conditioned fear memory.

Indexed as

Septal NucleiAmygdalaAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesFemaleMaleRatsSex CharacteristicsamygdalaconditioningfearFOSthreat

Identifiers

PMID34911788
PMCPMC8741146
OpenAlexW4200182481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.