Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911708›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Relationship between self-care activities, stress and well-being during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-cultural mediation model.

Elkin Luis, Elena Bermejo-Martins, Martín Martinez, Ainize Sarrionandia, Cristian Cortes, Edwin Yair Oliveros, María Sol Garces, José Victor Oron, Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Female Sexual Function.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Elkin LuisSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-1177
Elena Bermejo-MartinsIdiSNA, Navarre Institute of Health Research, Pamplona, Spain ebermejo@unav.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-3508
Martín MartinezSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3053-7920
Ainize SarrionandiaFaculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country, Donostia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-4370
Cristian CortesFaculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-4564
Edwin Yair OliverosSchool of Psychology, University of San Buenaventura, Bogotá, Colombia.
María Sol GarcesNeuroscience Institute, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-7137
José Victor OronUpToYou Fundation, Pamplona, Spain.
Pablo Fernández-BerrocalFaculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-2976
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversidad de San Buenaventura, Bogota · COUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the mediation role of self-care between stress and psychological well-being in the general population of four countries and to assess the impact of sociodemographic variables on this relationship.

designCross-sectional, online survey.

participantsA stratified sample of confined general population (N=1082) from four Ibero-American countries-Chile (n=261), Colombia (n=268), Ecuador (n=282) and Spain (n=271)-balanced by age and gender. PRIMARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Sociodemographic information (age, gender, country, education and income level), information related to COVID-19 lockdown (number of days in quarantine, number of people with whom the individuals live, absence/presence of adults and minors in charge and attitude towards the search of information related to COVID-19), Perceived Stress Scale-10, Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scale-29 and Self-Care Activities Screening Scale-14.

resultsSelf-care partially mediates the relationship between stress and well-being during COVID-19 confinement in the general population in the total sample (

conclusionThe results have broad implications for public health, highlighting the importance of promoting people's active role in their own care and health behaviour to improve psychological well-being if stress management and social determinants of health are jointly addressed first. The present study provides the first transnational evidence from the earlier stages of the COVID-19 lockdown, showing that the higher perception of stress, the less self-care activities are adopted, and in turn the lower the beneficial effects on well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19Self CareCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19mental healthpreventive medicineprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID34911708
PMCPMC8678542
OpenAlexW4200122692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.