Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911688›Full record

SynthesisEvidence-based mental health2022

Methods and efficacy of social support interventions in preventing suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaofei Hou, Jiali Wang, Jing Guo, Xinxu Zhang, Jiahai Liu, Linmao Qi, Liang Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Evidence-based mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suicide prediction, prevention, and the blame culture: A narrative review based on trends in mortality rates.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Suicide Risk Assessment on Social Media with Semi-Supervised Learning.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaofei HouDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-6466
Jiali WangDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jing GuoDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xinxu ZhangDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiahai LiuDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Linmao QiSchool of Mental Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Liang ZhouDepartment of Social Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China liangzhou_csu@vip.163.com.
Central South University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionSuicide is a global public and mental health problem. The effectiveness of social support interventions has not been widely demonstrated in the prevention of suicide. We aimed to describe the methods of social support interventions in preventing suicide and examine the efficacy of them. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We searched literature databases and conducted clinical trials. The inclusion criteria for the summary of intervention methods were as follows: (1) studies aimed at preventing suicide through method(s) that directly provide social support; (2) use of one or more method(s) to directly provide social support. The additional inclusion criteria for meta-analysis on the efficacy of these interventions included: (1) suicide, suicide attempt or social support-related outcome was measured; (2) randomised controlled trial design and (3) using social support intervention as the main/only method.

findingsIn total, 22 656 records and 185 clinical trials were identified. We reviewed 77 studies in terms of intervention methods, settings, support providers and support recipients. There was a total of 18 799 person-years among the ten studies measuring suicide. The number of suicides was significantly reduced in the intervention group (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.85). In 14 studies with a total of 14 469 person-years, there was no significant reduction of suicide attempts in the overall pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07).

conclusionsSocial support interventions were recommended as a suicide prevention strategy for those with elevated suicide risk.

Indexed as

Social SupportSuicide, AttemptedHumanssuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID34911688
PMCPMC8788249
OpenAlexW4225843960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.