Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911579›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Gabrielle Chicoine, José Côté, Jacinthe Pepin, Guillaume Fontaine, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Quan Nha Hong, Geneviève Rouleau, Daniela Ziegler, Didier Jutras-Aswad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabrielle ChicoineFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. gabrielle.chicoine@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3179-5806
José CôtéFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Jacinthe PepinFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Guillaume FontaineCentre for Implementation Research, Psychology and Health Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marc-André Maheu-CadotteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Quan Nha HongEPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, England.
Geneviève RouleauFUTUR Team-FRQSC, Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Daniela ZieglerUniversité de Montréal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Didier Jutras-AswadUniversité de Montréal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAFonds de Recherche du Québec - Société et culture · CAMontreal Heart Institute · CAOttawa Hospital · CAUniversity College London · GBWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals' competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO model is increasingly available in the literature, what influences the model effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) evidence regarding the ECHO Model effectiveness and the experiences/views of ECHO's participants about what influences the development of competencies in healthcare professionals.

methodsThe proposed systematic review was inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSR) and will follow a convergent segregated approach. A systematic search will be undertaken using QUAN, QUAL and mixed methods (MM) studies of ECHO-affiliated programs identified in six databases. A publication date filter will be applied to find the articles published from 2003 onwards. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched as well. Retrieved citations will independently be screened by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion until a consensus is reached or by including a third reviewer. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria will be assessed on methodological quality and the data will be extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Separate QUAN and QUAL synthesis will be performed, and findings will be integrated using a matrix approach for the purpose of comparison and complementarity. DISCUSSION: This MMSR will fulfill important gaps in the current literature on the ECHO Model as the first to provide estimates on its effectiveness and consider simultaneously the experiences/views of ECHO's participants. As each replication of the ECHO Model greatly varies depending on the context, topic, and targeted professionals, a better understanding of what influences the model effectiveness in developing healthcare professionals' competencies is crucial to inform future implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197579.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicContinuing medical educationDistance learningKnowledge-sharing communityProject ECHOTelementoringVideoconferencingVirtual collaborationVirtual community

Identifiers

PMID34911579
PMCPMC8675457
OpenAlexW4200007444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.