Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911568›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2021

Whole body regeneration and developmental competition in two botryllid ascidians.

Shane Nourizadeh, Susannah Kassmer, Delany Rodriguez, Laurel S Hiebert, Anthony W De Tomaso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Onset of Whole-Body Regeneration inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shane NourizadehDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA. nourizadeh@ucsb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4153-9857
Susannah KassmerDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA.
Delany RodriguezDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA.
Laurel S HiebertDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA.
Anthony W De TomasoDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA.

Funding

Allorecognition, parasitic stem cells and regeneration in a basal chordateR35GM139649 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI DE TOMASO, ANTHONY W · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Cell competition and stem cell parasitism in a basal chordateR01GM123255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI DE TOMASO, ANTHONY W · 2019 to 2020
$605k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123255NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139649NIH HHS GM123206NIH HHS GM123255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotryllid ascidians are a group of marine invertebrate chordates that are colonial and grow by repeated rounds of asexual reproduction to form a colony of individual bodies, called zooids, linked by a common vascular network. Two distinct processes are responsible for zooid regeneration. In the first, called blastogenesis, new zooids arise from a region of multipotent epithelium from a pre-existing zooid. In the second, called whole body regeneration (WBR), mobile cells in the vasculature coalesce and are the source of the new zooid. In some botryllid species, blastogenesis and WBR occur concurrently, while in others, blastogenesis is used exclusively for growth, while WBR only occurs following injury or exiting periods of dormancy. In species such as Botrylloides diegensis, injury induced WBR is triggered by the surgical isolation of a small piece of vasculature. However, Botryllus schlosseri has unique requirements that must be met for successful injury induced WBR. Our goal was to understand why there would be different requirements between these two species.

resultsWhile WBR in B. diegensis was robust, we found that in B. schlosseri, new zooid growth following injury is unlikely due to circulatory cells, but instead a result of ectopic development of tissues leftover from the blastogenic process. These tissues could be whole, damaged, or partially resorbed developing zooids, and we defined the minimal amount of vascular biomass to support ectopic regeneration. We did find a common theme between the two species: a competitive process exists which results in only a single zooid reaching maturity following injury. We utilized this phenomenon and found that competition is reversible and mediated by circulating factors and/or cells.

conclusionsWe propose that WBR does not occur in B. schlosseri and that the unique requirements defined in other studies only serve to increase the chances of ectopic development. This is likely a response to injury as we have discovered a vascular-based reversible competitive mechanism which ensures that only a single zooid completes development. This competition has been described in other species, but the unique response of B. schlosseri to injury provides a new model to study resource allocation and competition within an individual.

Indexed as

Asexual developmentCell competitionColonialityDevelopmental competitionNicheRegenerationStem cells

Identifiers

PMID34911568
PMCPMC8675491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.