Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911498›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2021

Visual acuity and anatomical changes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane foveoschisis: a case series.

Chaiyaphot Photcharapongsakul, Susama Chokesuwattanaskul, Janejit Choovuthayakorn, Voraporn Chaikitmongkol, Paradee Kunavisarut, Nawat Watanachai, Direk Patikulsila

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaiyaphot PhotcharapongsakulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Susama ChokesuwattanaskulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Janejit ChoovuthayakornDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. janejit.c@cmu.ac.th.
Voraporn ChaikitmongkolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Paradee KunavisarutDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Nawat WatanachaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Direk PatikulsilaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intavaroros Road, Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the visual outcome and macular anatomic structures on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis who underwent vitrectomy.

methodsA retrospective cohort, interventional, case series.

participantsFourteen patients (14 eyes) with central vision loss from an ERM foveoschisis underwent vitrectomy at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2017 to 2018 and had a follow-up period of 12 months.

interventionsThe 23G vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was performed by a single surgeon. MAIN OUTCOMES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic appearance on SD-OCT were assessed at the time of preoperative evaluations and post-operative follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

resultsFourteen patients with a mean (SD) age of 67.9 (7.9) years and a mean (SD) visual acuity (VA) of 0.6 (0.1) LogMAR units were included in this study. Significant VA improvements were observed at the 3-month (0.43 (0.14) LogMAR unit), 6-month (0.45 (0.16) LogMAR unit) and 12-month (0.37 (0.21) LogMAR unit) post-operative visits compared to baseline, all with P-values < 0.001. At month 12, there were vision improvements of ≥3 lines in 8 (57.2%) patients, vision improvements of 1 or 2 lines in 2 (14.3%) patients, vision remained at the same line of pre-operation in 3 (21.4%) patients, and vision decreased by 1 line in 1 (7.1%) patient. Regarding the anatomical outcomes, 13 (92.9%) patients achieved anatomical foveal restoration, while one had persistent intraretinal schisis at the 12-month follow-up. The median time to achieve a foveal restoration was 3 months. No significant visual impairments were observed post-operatively.

conclusionIn patients with central vision loss from ERM foveoschisis, vitrectomy with ILM stripping tended to improve both visual and anatomical outcomes.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneAgedBasement MembraneFollow-Up StudiesFovea CentralisHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAnatomical outcomesERM FoveoschisisVisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34911498
PMCPMC8672529
OpenAlexW4200197386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.