Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911485›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Changes in mental health during three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study among polish university students.

Aleksandra M Rogowska, Dominika Ochnik, Cezary Kuśnierz, Karolina Chilicka, Monika Jakubiak, Maria Paradowska, Luiza Głazowska, Dawid Bojarski, Julia Fijołek, Marcin Podolak and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The impact of COVID-19 on medical students.GMS journal for medical education · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of theInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predictors of Psychological Distress across Three Time Periods during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra M RogowskaInstitute of Psychology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland. arogowska@uni.opole.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-8916
Dominika OchnikFaculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Katowice, Poland.
Cezary KuśnierzFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Karolina ChilickaInstitute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Monika JakubiakFaculty of Economics, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Maria ParadowskaFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive studies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Luiza GłazowskaFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive studies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Dawid BojarskiFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive studies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Julia FijołekInstitute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Marcin PodolakFaculty of Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Maciej TomasiewiczFaculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Dominika NowickaFaculty of History, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Marek KawkaFaculty of "Artes Liberales", University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Maksymilian GrabarczykFaculty of Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Zuzanna BabińskaInstitute of the Middle and Far East, Faculty of International and Political Studies, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Opole · PLUniversity of Warsaw · PLAkademia Śląska · PLJagiellonian University · PLMaria Curie-Skłodowska University · PLOpole University of Technology · PLUniversity of Łódź · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch indicates that mental health worsened during the Coronavirus crisis, in particular among women and university students. However, few longitudinal studies have so far investigated the changes in mental health outcomes across three subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to examine changes in mental health among university students.

methodsA total of 1,961university students from Poland, at mean age 23.23 years (SD = 3.16, 57.47% of women) were included in this repeated cross-sectional study across three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: W1 (n = 657), W2 (n = 654), and W3 (n = 650). They completed the online survey with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), General Self-Rated Health (GSRH), and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), as well as sociodemographic variables.

resultsThe prevalence of people at high risk of anxiety and perceived stress, poorer physical health, and low life satisfaction changed significantly across three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of the two-way ANOVA showed that both the wave (W1<W2<W3) and gender (men<women) had a significant impact on the level of anxiety. Statistically significant changes in perceived stress were found between pandemic waves (W1>W2, W1>W3), and genders (men<women). Self-reported physical health significantly deteriorated in W3 compared to W1 and W2 (W1>W3, W2>W3), and was significantly worse in women than in men. The level of life satisfaction also decreased significantly in W3 (W1>W3, W2>W3), but did not differ between men and women. High GAD risk was presented two times more frequently among women and people who subjectively assessed their health as poor, three times more likely in participants dissatisfied with their lives, and seven times more probably in persons with high-stress levels.

conclusionsThe results of this study consistently indicate (using parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis) that there are significant differences in mental health problems across three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. It suggests that pandemic waves should be considered in future review studies and meta-analyses. Furthermore, these findings indicate a potential role for prevention and intervention programs aimed at alleviating life satisfaction and subjective assessment of health and improving coping skills to reduce stress and anxiety.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPolandSARS-CoV-2StudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultAnxietyLife satisfactionLogistic regressionPerceived stressPhysical healthPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34911485
PMCPMC8672339
OpenAlexW4200604157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.