Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34911382›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2022

Interferences With CGM Systems: Practical Relevance?

Lutz Heinemann

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Inpatient Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Managing discordance between HbADiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Review
  14. Practical Approaches to Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care: A UK-Based Consensus Opinion.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lutz HeinemannScience-Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Kaarst, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-1304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Blood GlucoseHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID34911382
PMCPMC8861798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.